Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0308:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 04
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare. - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
20 Jul 2010, 02:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
How do I write two equations and two unknowns (which includes using a ratio relationship) to answer this. On page 57 (Chapter covering Ratios) of the Manhattan Word Translations book, there is the following question:
"The ratio of men to women in a room is 3:4. If there are 56 people in the room, how many of the people are men?"
Okay, clearly you can just do \(3/7 of 56\) to get the number of men in the room. MGMAT also explains step-by-step how you can you use the 'Unknown Multiplier' approach to find the answer. I am, however, stuck on their suggestion that the question can additionally be solved using a ratio relationship.
They state: \(M (for men)/ W (for women)= 3/4\). Together with \(M + W= Total=56\), you can solve for M (and W, for that matter). The algebra for these "two equations and two unknowns" is not too difficult..." Could some please show how to do this 'two equations and two unknowns' approach.
"The ratio of men to women in a room is 3:4. If there are 56 people in the room, how many of the people are men?"
24 men
Okay, clearly you can just do \(3/7 of 56\) to get the number of men in the room. MGMAT also explains step-by-step how you can you use the 'Unknown Multiplier' approach to find the answer. I am, however, stuck on their suggestion that the question can additionally be solved using a ratio relationship.
They state: \(M (for men)/ W (for women)= 3/4\). Together with \(M + W= Total=56\), you can solve for M (and W, for that matter). The algebra for these "two equations and two unknowns" is not too difficult..." Could some please show how to do this 'two equations and two unknowns' approach.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
20 Jul 2010, 03:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
M (for Men)/ W (for women) = 3/4 --- (a)
Now as per question total number of people = 56
i.e. M + W = 56 --- (b)
Using equation (a)
4M = 3W
=> 4/3(M) = W
Using value of W in equation in (b)
M + 4/3(M) = 56
7/3(M) = 56
M = 56 * 3 /7 = 24
Hope this helps!!
Now as per question total number of people = 56
i.e. M + W = 56 --- (b)
Using equation (a)
4M = 3W
=> 4/3(M) = W
Using value of W in equation in (b)
M + 4/3(M) = 56
7/3(M) = 56
M = 56 * 3 /7 = 24
Hope this helps!!
20 Jul 2010, 05:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Perfection! Thanks a lot Varun for the solid explanation, just what I was after, kudos 
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
