The US news tracks student "quality", FT tracks earning potential, BW tracks a bunch of things (and maybe nothing) and Forbes is all about the fortune (ROI).
So what does an old boy (or girl, chill) do when they look to rankings and try to identify their school of choice?
Well, for international students, their region and function of influence matters a great deal. If you are in India or China - British universities still hold a great deal of prestige just from name in old school organizations and their LDP programs. Colonialism be damned, there is value prescribed to an LBS or Oxford or Cambridge which defies stats or logic.
The whole US school vs INSEAD/LBS debate has been had and won (by the US schools). Duke, NYU, Ross all receive twice the number of applications per seat as LBS or Insead. A quick search of "MBA Intern" for jobs on Linkedin filtered for UK vs USA will tell you the difference in demand.
alexchu had the best go at it - there is a top 8 - HSW, Booth, Kellogg, Sloan, CBS and Tuck in no particular order. Then top 16 - Ross, NYU, Duke, Darden, Cornell, Yale, Haas and UCLA (in no particular order). Of course region matters (or not) and function matters (or not). I'd usually average 5 years worth of rankings anywhere to get this list.
So which school is better - Tuck or Ross? No scholarship and no regional biases aside, you go with where your choice firm hires more. i.e. Tuck for MBB and Ross for Amazon. Remote schools are tougher for banking jobs, which is why NYU holds its top 10 credentials regularly, despite maybe a dwindling cult following on Gmatclub.
Speaking of cult following - here's P&Q with their thoughts :
https://poetsandquants.com/2016/05/27/u ... ss-seat/2/
Paid advertising aside, take money when you can, go to the best school that'll have you, and if you get in IIM-A in India just do it!!