Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struck with below problem found in MGMAT SC FLASHCARDS - Question- The resort was advertised as a place where singles can meet one another and that offers an Olympic‐sized swimming pool.
ANSWER as given there - This question is about parallelism. Parallel clauses involving relative pronouns should start with the same relative pronoun (“where” and “that” do not match.)
Hence : The resort was advertised as a place where singles can meet one another and where guests can swim in an Olympic-sized swimming pool.
My Doubt - Above highlighted part contradicts with Below point mentioned in MGMAT SC GUIDE -
The subordinators do not have to be identical. Right: There are many people WHO speak English BUT WHOSE parents do not.
Thus, according to MGMAT SC GUIDE - relative clauses in parallel can start with different words.
Kindly resolve this paradox, whether Relative clauses(also acting as subordinate clauses) in parallel can start with different words or not ?
Thanks in advance !
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
What looks like a paradox here in your setup isn't really much of an issue. Your flashcard example states in the answer that parallel structures "should" have matching relative pronouns. Clearly we can (and should) fix the mismatch of relative pronouns in that sentence. The second example, on the other hand, is a rare counterexample that doesn't allow us to use the exact same relative pronoun. We can't say "There are many people WHO speak English BUT WHO parents do not." We can use a a variation of the pronoun "Who", namely "Whose, that creates proper meaning. By using "Whose" we are staying as true as possible to the principle that we "should" match pronouns while maintaining the meaning of the sentence.
KW
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.