The rules of etiquette for formal dinner parties with : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 Feb 2017, 08:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The rules of etiquette for formal dinner parties with

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

The rules of etiquette for formal dinner parties with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 02:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:54) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The rules of etiquette for formal dinner parties with foreign diplomats require <citizens from both the host and from the diplomat's countries to be seated across from each other.>

A) citizens from both the host and from the diplomat's countries to be seated across from each other.

B) citizens of the host country and of the diplomat's party to sit opposite each other.

C) that the host country and diplomat's country seat their citizens opposite one another.

D) that citizens of the host's country be seated opposite those of the diplomat's country.

E) the host country's citizens to be seated opposite to the diplomat's country's citizens.

Is it grammatically incorrect to use two possesive adjectives as in the last option.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 171
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: rules of etiquette - SC. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 03:08
I'd go for D. There too, I'd like it to be worded like this
"that citizens of the host country be seated opposite those of the diplomat's country."

anuramm wrote:
E) the host country's citizens to be seated opposite to the diplomat's country's citizens.

Yes, E seems to have a problem. I don't know what, but it does not sound that good to me. I am unable to pin-point what the grammatical mistake here is (if there is one).

Ideas?
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 0

Re: rules of etiquette - SC. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 06:41
I don't think it is incorrect to use 2 possesives. But, here it doesn't make sensible sentence.

subjunctive mood: require (hypothetical situation--possibility) needs "be". D follows that.

some good info (webster commnet):

1.Miguel's and Cecilia's new cars are in the parking lot.
This means that each of them has at least one new car and that their ownership is a separate matter.

2.Miguel and Cecilia's new cars are in the parking lot.
This construction tells us that Miguel and Cecilia share ownership of these cars. The possessive (indicated by 's) belongs to the entire phrase, not just to Cecilia.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245
Location: INDIA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 08:30
I would go wid E ...

the idiom ''opposit to'' is the best ... and I believe only perfects that ....

hope that helps

have fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 09:15
The OA is D.

The reason why E is wrong as per the book is -

(E) is faulty in two respects. It includes the word 'to' twice; the second occurrence is redundant and should be omitted. Also, the use of double possessive adjectives ('diplomat's' and 'country's') is improper.

I didn't know how to interpret improper - whether its always incoorect or its incorrect here.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245
Location: INDIA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 09:37
well...

thanks a lot...

have fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 353
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2004, 14:35
what's wrong with C?

never mind, 'host country and diplomat's country' is unparallel. time to rest...
19 Jul 2004, 14:35
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Though the term “empath” is not considered a formal designation of 3 05 Nov 2016, 04:59
Provided with formal training in a variety of proven 1 04 Jun 2012, 21:48
6 The agreement, the first to formally require industrialized 15 09 Jan 2009, 16:53
1 The agreement, the first to formally require industrialized 6 24 Jun 2008, 09:34
5 Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in 11 20 Jun 2007, 10:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by