Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
59%
(01:24)
correct 41%
(01:22)
wrong
based on 41
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern california, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.
a. banked with dirt to a height of b. banked with dirt as high as that of c. banked them with dirt to a height of d. was banked with dirt as high as e. was banked with dirt as high as that of
I know that this question has been discussed many times, but I have a question that no one has mentioned.
One of the reasons that D is incorrect is that "as high as 3 to 4 feet" is grammatically incorrect. How about meaning issue? Can I say that "dirt as high as 3 to 4 feet" means that dirt itself is 3 to 4 feet if assumed that "as high as 3 to 4 feet" didn't have a grammatical problem?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern california, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.
a. banked with dirt to a height of b. banked with dirt as high as that of c. banked them with dirt to a height of d. was banked with dirt as high as e. was banked with dirt as high as that of
I know that this question has been discussed many times, but I have a question that no one has mentioned.
One of the reasons that D is incorrect is that "as high as 3 to 4 feet" is grammatically incorrect. How about meaning issue? Can I say that "dirt as high as 3 to 4 feet" means that dirt itself is 3 to 4 feet if assumed that "as high as 3 to 4 feet" didn't have a grammatical problem?
Show more
The single family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.
This question highlights two very important things to succeed in SC. First is the identification of the "subject" and "object" of the sentence. Second is the slash and burn technique to remove extra useless information to achieve the barest composition of the sentence.
Lets apply these two criterion here :- The single family house constructed by the Yana ,a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.
The new sentence becomes:- The single family house constructed by the Yana was banked with dirt to a height of 3 to 4 feet. The subject of the sentence is "HOUSE" and the original sentence is already correct and perfect. WE DO NOT NEED ANY MODIFICATION IN THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE, THUS A IS THE CORRECT ANSWER
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.