Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nitya34
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
4,361
 [25]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 516
Kudos: 4,361
 [25]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
TommyWallach
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
7,316
 [7]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Location: San Francisco
Concentration: Journalism
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 323
Kudos: 7,316
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
nitya34
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 516
Kudos: 4,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
seofah
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 03 Apr 2010
Posts: 486
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 486
Kudos: 3,121
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nitya34
OE says "The adverbial phrase 'more quickly than' is appropriate compared to quicker"
But choosing "had been" and not "have been"(not continuing any more,IMO)
hence OA-E.
Seems to make sense - only that I didn't see a good reason for past perfect (present perfect doesn't work either).
What is a source?
User avatar
ritula
Joined: 18 May 2008
Last visit: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
3,159
 [1]
Posts: 695
Kudos: 3,159
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had also chosen D. Nitya , is it given in OE the reason for chosing "had been" over "have been"?
Can sum1 throw light on this?
nitya34
OE says "The adverbial phrase 'more quickly than' is appropriate compared to quicker"
But choosing "had been" and not "have been"(not continuing any more,IMO)
hence OA-E.
User avatar
cici
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Last visit: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
906
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 9
Kudos: 906
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO, E

because "had been" is used when the action is over
versus "have been" is used when the action continues.

The former suits in this case.
User avatar
nitya34
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 516
Kudos: 4,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes
source:Other Forum

E
The adverbial phrase 'more quickly than' is appropriate compared to
quicker. A, B, C are out.
"have been in the past" is incorrect expression, because "have been"
means in the past but still taking affect till now , it can not associate
with "past only". D out
User avatar
rampuria
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:La Martiniere for Boys
Posts: 149
Kudos: 310
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nitya34
Yes
source:Other Forum

E
The adverbial phrase 'more quickly than' is appropriate compared to
quicker. A, B, C are out.
"have been in the past" is incorrect expression, because "have been"
means in the past but still taking affect till now , it can not associate
with "past only". D out


Isn't it still effective till date. Thats why the writer say " should be".

Moderators can your help us out.
avatar
deepak4mba
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Last visit: 28 May 2010
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E.

more quickly is correct and not quicker.
had been implies it is over rather than still continuing (have been)
User avatar
arjunsridhar84
Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Last visit: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Jacksonville
Concentration: entrepreneurship
Schools:INSEAD, ISB, NANYANG, NSU
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guys - i have a small question here -

the question actually talks about the new strategy that has to be implemented is as if it is a continual process going on year after year right - in that case - it should actually be "had been" rather than "have been" right?

am i misunderstanding anything?

Cheers
User avatar
qurenmoon
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Last visit: 09 Mar 2013
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good thread!

My first choice is D, but at last I think E is the best one. Because it had been finished already in the past.
User avatar
hrish88
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Last visit: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 14
Kudos: 385
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TommyWallach
Hey All,

I'd like to weigh in briefly on this question, though in the same spirit of curious examination as the rest of you. This question seems a little bit fishy to me, for reasons I'll try to explain.

The correct use of the past perfect tense on the GMAT requires the existence of a verb in the simple past. As far as I can see, this sentence does not have one. The only verbs we get are "states", which is present tense, and "should be implemented", which is a conditional tense (more like future). Because there is no past tense, I cannot justify the past perfect. You could justify the SIMPLE past "more quickly than they were in the past", but that isn't an answer choice.

I realize the present perfect doesn't feel great, but I'd like to justify it thusly: because of the phrase "in the past", we are actually talking about something that CONTINUES to be true (i.e. it remains true, in the present, that this was going on IN THE PAST). This would lead me to a present perfect verb, as in answer choice D.

My actual preference would be for an answer choice that doesn't exist (as described above, with "were"), but because of the lack of a simple past verb, I don't see answer choice E being correct.

I'm open for debate, but feel confident.

Hope that helps!

agree with Tommy.ans has to be D
User avatar
bakfed
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Last visit: 12 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Status:Darden Class of 2013
Schools:University of Virginia
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
Posts: 1,768
Kudos: 1,245
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I went for (D) as well. I think the source needs to be checked on this one.
User avatar
reply2spg
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Last visit: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 270
Kudos: 4,496
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree that had been is correct but what is the difference between more quickly than and quicker than?

What is the reson that A is incorrect?
User avatar
TommyWallach
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
7,316
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Location: San Francisco
Concentration: Journalism
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 323
Kudos: 7,316
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey There,

"Quicker" is not technically a word, though it has moved into common speech. On the GMAT, you can't use "quicker", only "more quickly" as the comparative of "quick".

Word.
avatar
shimo
Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Last visit: 08 Dec 2011
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 6
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also agree with Tommy and prefer D to E.
User avatar
verycoolguy33
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 17
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ,I would go for E.
It is not always true that you need to have a explicit past tense verb in a sentence to justify the use of past perfect . The explicit mention of the word 'past' does the work of the past tense and any action performed prior to that should be referred as past perfect .
hence E is correct .
User avatar
rajeshaaidu
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Last visit: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Posts: 10
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with you Tommy, but I have gone with E because I thouht that I am not suppose to change the meaning of the original sentence. If it want to indicate to past, I have selected E between E and D. But reading your thoughts now I got confused between D and E, but still I will go with E (I think we should keep the intended meaning of the author in the case of the selection of the tense.)
User avatar
sonnco
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Last visit: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 58
Status:Trying to get into the illustrious 700 club!
Posts: 19
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TommyWallach
Hey There,

"Quicker" is not technically a word, though it has moved into common speech. On the GMAT, you can't use "quicker", only "more quickly" as the comparative of "quick".

Word.

Thanks.. that's one of the reasons why I missed this problem :x
User avatar
yuvrajpratap
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Last visit: 29 May 2016
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 17
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) the strategy guidelines should be implemented more quickly than they have been in the past
(E) the strategy guidelines should be implemented more quickly than they had been in the past

I am really confused ... both had\have refer to strategy guidelines (am I right?)

if I am right then ans should be d and not e because "strategy guidelines" is plural and requires have.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts