Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
14 Dec 2020, 11:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
shauryahanda
Hi Shaurya
The premises given in the stimulus cannot be negated by the assumption (or strengthener, or weakener). The role of the assumption is to connect the premises to the conclusion, and the strengthener and/or weakener must also play the same role (though in opposing directions).
The stimulus clearly states: "...it invests more cash in its research and development department..."
This means that more cash is definitely invested no matter the circumstances. The argument you have presented seems to negate the given premise that more cash is invested in R&D, which is not allowed. If we were to consider option (A), we must consider it as it is (that employees demand higher wages) without it affecting any of the given premises.
Hope this clarifies.
17 May 2021, 09:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
Premise : company invest in R&D in following year after successful year.
Conclusion : company should generate ideas in following years.
Q. Weakening
A. Employee asking for higher wages- no where related with conclusion of innovation generation.
C. Since R&D members are generating more ideas although management is having no time but it is rather supporting the conclusion.
D. With increase in monetary rewards there are chances that idea generation will be more.
E. The answer I simply guessed without dwelling on it is wrong because conclusion is asking for more idea generation than successful innovation. Therefore it's rather support the conclusion than weaken it.
B. More participation of management and alteration will lead to anything but innovation and only plausible option which is obliquely weakening conclusion.
Posted from my mobile device
Conclusion : company should generate ideas in following years.
Q. Weakening
A. Employee asking for higher wages- no where related with conclusion of innovation generation.
C. Since R&D members are generating more ideas although management is having no time but it is rather supporting the conclusion.
D. With increase in monetary rewards there are chances that idea generation will be more.
E. The answer I simply guessed without dwelling on it is wrong because conclusion is asking for more idea generation than successful innovation. Therefore it's rather support the conclusion than weaken it.
B. More participation of management and alteration will lead to anything but innovation and only plausible option which is obliquely weakening conclusion.
Posted from my mobile device
01 Apr 2025, 23:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
