I agree that people should be circumspect to know that one man's setback could be another man's dream. At the same time, I'm not sure people really need to moderate their language to compensate. Do I get upset when people talk about getting Q50/51 easily after studying for a week or two and I'm over here working my tail off for a year for my 48?! Not really--I'm happy to have what I think is a great score for me and I understand that everyone's situations are different.
I think we should be smart enough individually to tune out someone else's emotional noise and follow our own compass about what different scores mean to us. Who cares if someone gets a great score and then speaks of it in a way that reflects poorly on their self-awareness? Why try to change that person; just tune them out. Most folks with that level of ignorance aren't going to get too far on their great score anyway--it takes a lot more than that imo.
I do think this board serves as a good emotional outlet for people. Moderating one's feelings works against that a bit. For me the act of writing up my own progression was cathartic. I scored a "dreadful" 690 that was, I'm sorry to say, very much a disappointment for me. I had tested better than that, worked hard to do better, and needed to do better--so it was a "dreadful" outcome for me. As a function of my expectations, inputs and requirements, viewing it as a derogatory outcome doesn't actually seem unreasonable to me. At the same time, hopefully, I didn't offend anyone with my discussion--I get your point, but I think there are some nuances I suppose.
In any event, interesting angle and it always helps to consider what others are seeing and thinking. Cheers.