It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 21:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Today just is not my day.. One more SC which stumped me....

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 165

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Today just is not my day.. One more SC which stumped me....  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 22:47
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Today just is not my day.. One more SC which stumped me....

He had himself baptized, chosen an influential godfather, and managed, by planking down considerable sums of money, to purchase the privilege of replacing for the name "Kanitz" the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".

(A) to purchase the privilege of replacing for the name "Kanitz" the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".
(B) to purchase the privilege of replacing by the name "Kanitz" the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".
(C) to purchase the privilege of substituting by the name "Kanitz" the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".
(D) to purchase the privilege of replacing the name "Kanitz" with the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".
(E) to purchase the privilege of substituting for the name "Kanitz" the more aristocratic and euphonious one of "von kekesfalva".

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 23:31
D it is

replacing for
replacing by
substituting by

are all incorrect usages

the correct usage is replacing X
_________________

AimHigher

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1020

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2007, 06:15
The right idiom is "to replace with." Hence, D is the answer.

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2007, 07:14
yea D is the only one that makes sense....I can understand how something like this may be harder for a non native speaker , to me without even analyzing the choices the others use language that is never used.

replacing for the name
replacing by the name
subsituting by the name
substituting for the name

all are unidiomatic awkward phrases

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 431

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2007, 11:41
wavered between D and E and chose D
both "substitue X for Y" and "replace Y with X" are idiomatic
but I have never heard "substitute for Y X"
So I think it is D too

Last edited by Caas on 23 Mar 2007, 14:30, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - von kekesfalva [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2007, 15:01
Two idioms: replace X with Y, substitute X for Y.
Only D uses the correct idiom.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - von kekesfalva   [#permalink] 22 Mar 2007, 15:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by