Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 11:02 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 11:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SVaidyaraman
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 566
Own Kudos:
1,833
 [36]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 566
Kudos: 1,833
 [36]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
tizen
Joined: 26 Apr 2015
Last visit: 08 Jul 2021
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
69
 [16]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GRE 1: Q760 V650
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GRE 1: Q760 V650
Posts: 16
Kudos: 69
 [16]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SVaidyaraman
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 566
Own Kudos:
1,833
 [7]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 566
Kudos: 1,833
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
srcc25anu
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Last visit: 14 Aug 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question does not make any sense. Could you please let us know the source of this question.
User avatar
nphilli1
Joined: 24 May 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 9
Kudos: 167
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just to double check, isn't the number of smaller cubes within a larger cube \(r^3\)not \(r^r\)?
User avatar
SVaidyaraman
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 566
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 566
Kudos: 1,833
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nphilli1
Just to double check, isn't the number of smaller cubes within a larger cube \(r^3\)not \(r^r\)?

You are right. Made the correction.
avatar
qlx
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SravnaTestPrep
SravnaTestPrep
A cube is made up of equal smaller cubes. Two of the sides of the larger cube are called A and B. What is the total number of smaller cubes?

(1) When n smaller cubes are painted on A , n is 1/9 of the total number of smaller cubes.
(2) When m smaller cubes are painted on B, m is 1/3 of the total number of smaller cubes


Fact 1: When a cube is made of equal smaller cubes, the number of smaller cubes is \(r^3\) where r is natural number.

Fact 2: Out of the six sides of the bigger cube, we are considering two sides and have named them A and B resp.

Statement 1: when on side A, n smaller cubes are painted we have that value of n equal to 1/9 of the total number of smaller cubes. So n is divisible by 9. Or the number of smaller cubes is a multiple of 9. Statement is not sufficient to answer the question because for example both 27 smaller cubes and 729 smaller cubes satisfy the conditions that the number of smaller cubes is a multiple of 9 and satisfies fact 1.

Statement 2: In this case the number of smaller cubes is a multiple of 3. The number of smaller cubes cannot be greater than \(3^3\) based on this statement alone.

Assume first the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 27. In this case each side has 9 smaller cubes exposed. If the number of smaller cubes painted, which is m, is 9.we have m =1/3 of the number of smaller cubes.

Assume next the the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 216. In this case each side has 36 smaller cubes exposed. So you could paint a maximum of 36 smaller cubes. Thus maximum value of m is 36/216 = 1/6 which cannot be equal to 1/3.

For higher multiples of 3, the value of m would keep on decreasing and would never satisfy the conditions mentioned.

Thus statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer this question.

Therefore answer is choice B.

Sorry to point this out but something here is leading to confusion.

First of all if n is the total number of smaller cubes then each surface would have n/6 cubes exposed. This is what I derive from the green highlighted text where it says if 216 is total number of cubes then each surface would have 36 exposed which means we are doing 216/6= 36

By the same logic if 27 is the total number of smaller cubes then each side should have 27/6 number of cubes exposed which means 4.5cubes.
so you can paint a maximum of 4.5 cubes.

(So how come you say that for 27 total number of smaller cubes each side would have 9 cubes exposed?shouldn't it be 27/6 as you did for 216/6)

by your logic
4.5/27= 1/6 , this is what we were getting for 216 cubes too!, so we cannot have 1/3 hence it seems that even 27 total smaller cubes is not a possibility.

Please let me know if I have not understood something.
User avatar
pretzel
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Last visit: 28 Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 79
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused.

Quote:
Assume first the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 27. In this case each side has 9 smaller cubes exposed. If the number of smaller cubes painted, which is m, is 9.we have m =1/3 of the number of smaller cubes.

Assume next the the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 216. In this case each side has 36 smaller cubes exposed. So you could paint a maximum of 36 smaller cubes. Thus maximum value of m is 36/216 = 1/6 which cannot be equal to 1/3.

It seems like both Statement 1 and 2 can satisfy the relationship.
avatar
qlx
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
293
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 293
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pretzel
I am confused.

Quote:
Assume first the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 27. In this case each side has 9 smaller cubes exposed. If the number of smaller cubes painted, which is m, is 9.we have m =1/3 of the number of smaller cubes.

Assume next the the number of smaller cubes which is a multiple of 3 and satisfies fact 1, is 216. In this case each side has 36 smaller cubes exposed. So you could paint a maximum of 36 smaller cubes. Thus maximum value of m is 36/216 = 1/6 which cannot be equal to 1/3.

It seems like both Statement 1 and 2 can satisfy the relationship.

if i am not mistaken , question may be flawed as I have tried to show above. check this :
a-cube-is-made-up-of-equal-smaller-cubes-two-of-the-sides-149440.html#p1369419

Let me know if you see any discrepancies in my explanation.
Thanks
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,966
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109748 posts
498 posts
212 posts