Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 15:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 15:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
anik19890
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Last visit: 17 Mar 2016
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
118
 [15]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 24
Kudos: 118
 [15]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,395
Own Kudos:
5,124
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,395
Kudos: 5,124
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jakeqs
Joined: 19 Feb 2015
Last visit: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
17
 [2]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 17
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 842
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [3]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 842
Kudos: 2,613
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2 mins 27 sec .. couldn't get it. :( Have never seen an RC with only a single question before, interesting.

Summary:
Talks a bunch about TS Elliot's letters - are they as good as everyone projects them. How were they written? Who all were a part of the correspondence and along with another writer Thomas McGreevy's creation they are in contention to be essential reading for anyone with an interest in modern writing.

This is a detail question with a not so direct reference in the passage - we need to be able to spot the scrupulously courteous and relate it back to being formal in a very detailed way. A long shot for anyone in a hurry to solve the question.
What aspect of Eliot’s letter writing does the author specifically address?

A. Their formality Bingo - this is the direct translation of the above words and hence the right answer
B. Their multifacetedness Could be true since they form an essential read for anyone interested in writing but not as direct as (A)
C. Their expansive scope TRAP one might think that since there is a correspondence with such long list of well-established writers that the scope of the letters could be expansive, however, this is not the case. Since the author does not specifically address this, this option is incorrect. As the question is asking for a specific address by the author. Very smart.
D. Their renown TRAP for the same reasons as mentioned above
E.Their superficiality WRONG - irrelevant and out of scope.

Tough options for the single question passage.
Regards,
Gladi
User avatar
CockySaint
Joined: 22 Feb 2023
Last visit: 11 Feb 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 18
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladiator59
2 mins 27 sec .. couldn't get it. :( Have never seen an RC with only a single question before, interesting.

Summary:
Talks a bunch about TS Elliot's letters - are they as good as everyone projects them. How were they written? Who all were a part of the correspondence and along with another writer Thomas McGreevy's creation they are in contention to be essential reading for anyone with an interest in modern writing.

This is a detail question with a not so direct reference in the passage - we need to be able to spot the scrupulously courteous and relate it back to being formal in a very detailed way. A long shot for anyone in a hurry to solve the question.
What aspect of Eliot’s letter writing does the author specifically address?

A. Their formality Bingo - this is the direct translation of the above words and hence the right answer
B. Their multifacetedness Could be true since they form an essential read for anyone interested in writing but not as direct as (A)
C. Their expansive scope TRAP one might think that since there is a correspondence with such long list of well-established writers that the scope of the letters could be expansive, however, this is not the case. Since the author does not specifically address this, this option is incorrect. As the question is asking for a specific address by the author. Very smart.
D. Their renown TRAP for the same reasons as mentioned above
E.Their superficiality WRONG - irrelevant and out of scope.

Tough options for the single question passage.
Regards,
Gladi
­How did you reject D? The passage explicitly states the roster has big names. I felt that formality is underreported and the passage speaks more about renown. Can you please help me to see where I might be wrong?
User avatar
arthurmorgan1912
Joined: 17 May 2023
Last visit: 27 Oct 2025
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Got it why option A is correct?

but in last line
Criterion contributor and close friend of Samuel Beckett, whose recently published letters vie with Eliot's as essential purchases for anyone with an interest in modern writing.

It means that SB and Eliot's letters compete with each other as essential purchases for anyone with an interest in modern writing

if Eliot's letters are considered essential, then they can be renowed right?
User avatar
BinodBhai
Joined: 19 Feb 2025
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Posts: 113
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aren't most RC questions based around the contradiction location.. here as well the author says "But the dazzling roster of correspondents makes even the most humdrum exchanges of interest."... dazzling roster of correspondents is more striking language than the former line.. and thus i thought the answer would revolve around this..

Now coming to this "they are couched in a scrupulously courteous register that becomes wearisome when read in quantity." it does mean formal but it loudly speaks "letters were boring" rather than formal.

Good passage, poor quality question.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts