Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 03:28 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 03:28
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
810,355
 [10]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,355
 [10]
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 19 Dec 2018, 06:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

93% (01:03) correct 7% (01:29) wrong based on 1885 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.


(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollution

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Every tricky question should trigger a follow up quiz. Build that habit with GMAT Club Forum Quiz →.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,463
 [13]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,463
 [13]
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 19 Dec 2018, 07:02
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If this question were to appear in the Test, one could simply select B without any more thought. The adjective 'responsible' is always one up above the noun responsibility in the hierarchy of formal writing. Strangely all the other four choices are ridden with the noun 'responsibility' and all the four are lousy.
General Discussion
avatar
Suneha123
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Last visit: 05 Apr 2021
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 3
Status:BDM
Posts: 19
Kudos: 13
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 03 Jul 2020, 04:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, I marked the correct choice as it is conveying the meaning in a concise way but wanted to check what can be the concrete reasons to eliminate other options. I feel other options are not conveying the meaning properly but couldn't find any grammatical error as such. Can you please throw some light here?
User avatar
DhruvS
User avatar
Joined: 09 May 2018
Last visit: 07 May 2022
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 121
Location: India
Posts: 38
Kudos: 77
 [1]
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 25 Jul 2020, 02:57
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suneha123
GMATNinja, I marked the correct choice as it is conveying the meaning in a concise way but wanted to check what can be the concrete reasons to eliminate other options. I feel other options are not conveying the meaning properly but couldn't find any grammatical error as such. Can you please throw some light here?
Show more

daagh has already mentioned a great trick to spot the correct answer. :thumbsup: :)

Though I'll add few more points for your Suneha123 clarity:

According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.


(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollution

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have


"would and should" must not be used in the "if" clause. Hence (C) and (E) are eliminated.

Option (D) is wordy and Passive and Awkward. " the responsibility of the owner" can be written in Active form "the owner is not responsible". It is Awkward because "responsibility...is not that".

Option (A) can be eliminated for it being awkwardly wordy "did not have the responsibility". This can be simply put as "is not responsible".

Hope this helps :thumbsup: :angel:
avatar
[email protected]
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2022
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 26 Mar 2022, 19:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We can also say "That" relative pronoun is wrongly addressing Responsibly for other options which is not logical. Please add your thoughts if my approach is right.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
6,160
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,160
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 29 Mar 2022, 05:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[email protected]
We can also say "That" relative pronoun is wrongly addressing Responsibly for other options which is not logical. Please add your thoughts if my approach is right.
Show more

Hello [email protected],

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, this reasoning is not actually correct because in this sentence "that" serves as a preposition rather than as a pronoun.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
san10789
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2021
Last visit: 24 Nov 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
25
Given Kudos: 75
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Schools: IIML IPMX'25 (A)
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V31
GPA: 4
Schools: IIML IPMX'25 (A)
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V31
Posts: 48
Kudos: 25
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 14 Sep 2022, 03:46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.


(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollution

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have
Show more

I am fine with SC part. But what does this sentence says. Would anyone convey in plain , especially - occurred before the title changed hands.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
6,160
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,160
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 14 Sep 2022, 04:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
san10789
Bunuel
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of polluted land is liable for the cleanup of the property even if the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution occurred before the title changed hands.


(A) the owner did not have the responsibility that pollution

(B) the owner is not responsible for pollution that

(C) it was not the owner’s responsibility that pollution would have

(D) the responsibility of the owner is not that pollution

(E) the responsibility was not the owner’s that pollution would have

I am fine with SC part. But what does this sentence says. Would anyone convey in plain , especially - occurred before the title changed hands.
Show more

Hello san10789,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the intended meaning here is that in case any pollution occurred before the title changed hands, the owner is responsible for cleaning it up, even if the owner was not responsible for the pollution occurring.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,399
Own Kudos:
1,009
Posts: 19,399
Kudos: 1,009
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner of pollute 24 Dec 2023, 14:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
494 posts
bhanu29
358 posts