Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 01:16 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 01:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatt1476
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 496
Own Kudos:
27,294
 [27]
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 496
Kudos: 27,294
 [27]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
auradediligodo
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
861
 [8]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
51,882
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,882
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

3. In the second paragraph, the author discusses Beethoven’s first piano concerto primarily in order to

Explanation

The first piano concerto is introduced at lines 15-16, and as such it acts as the “evidence,” mentioned in the previous sentence, that such eminent composers as Beethoven imagined weird notes that the instruments of the day couldn’t play. In particular, the piece features that high F-sharp that only some hypothetical future piano could hit. (D) expresses not only the point of mentioning the concerto, but the essence of para 2 overall as a problem with the early music movement’s premises.

(A) has it backwards. Beethoven was forced to include a “wrong” note in his score because the pianos at the time couldn’t accommodate the correct melody. Only later did the range of pianos expand.

(B) Au contraire, Beethoven explicitly did anticipate the more sophisticated piano of the future as he imagined notes that contemporary pianos couldn’t hit.

(C) We’re told only that Beethoven thought about revising his earlier works, from which we can’t infer that a revised version of his first piano concerto actually exists. Thus, Beethoven’s first piano concerto is not used here to show that early music advocates stick to original scores despite later revisions, because we don’t even know that there is a revised score for this piece.

(E) Au contraire again—the piano available at the time Beethoven wrote the first piano concerto frustrated the great composer’s intentions by lacking the high F-sharp called for by the melody.

• Check the context of any detail mentioned in a question stem. Often the detail’s purpose is made clear (as it is here) by the text that directly precedes or follows it.

• Beware of au-contraire choices, choices that provide the opposite of what we’re looking for. Here, there are no fewer than three wrong choices that seem to contradict the information in the passage.

ANSWER: D

5. Which one of the following best describes the organization of the last paragraph?

Explanation

The second “troubling question” raised by the early music movement is its “divorc[ing of] music and its performance from . . . life” (lines 26-27). That criticism is followed up in para 3 by two specific examples: the inappropriate inclusion of the “silent” time-keeping piano, and the change in tempos due to changes in audience behavior. (B) is right on the money.

(A) The author is not in the business of “undermining” his own assertion, and the only things he “rejects” are some of the premises of the early music movement, but that’s not what (A) refers to.

(C) Para 3 begins not with a statement of the movement’s assumptions, but an indictment of one of its practices. That indictment is subsequently supported, not undermined.

(D) That phrase “frequently provided” is curious—what’s it based on? Anyway, para 3’s evidence is approvingly cited, not “critically evaluated.”

(E) The “two specific cases” (the silent piano; the tempo examples) are preceded by a criticism (lines 26-27) that they’re there to support. (E) has it backwards.

ANSWER: B

Hope it helps
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

2. Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?

Explanation

This one is pretty much a slam dunk, reflecting as it does the crucial sentence in lines (Nevertheless, the early music approach to performance raises profound and troubling questions.): The early music approach “raises profound and troubling questions” with respect to performance. As mentioned above, this sentence is pregnant with promise—what are these problems?—and the answer is found in the remaining two Paras.

(B) gives the early music movement too much credit—“largely successful” is not a judgment the author makes—and to narrow the rest of the passage discussion merely to “the use of obsolete instruments” leaves out most of what drives para 2 and 3: Beethoven’s imagined piano, the time-beating problem, and the tempo issues.

(C) keys off of a problem alluded to in para 2 but falls far short of summing up the entire passage.

(D), (E) Neither the lack (D), nor the incomplete use (E), of information is ever alluded to as central to the author’s interest in the early music movement.

• When you’re confident about an answer choice early in the set, you should still at least glance at the remaining choices, but in a different way: with less respect. Don’t waste time evaluating them in depth; your task has shifted to simply making sure they’re as bad as they need to be, considering that you’re pretty sure you already have the winner. It may not seem like this will save you much time, but a few seconds gained on a handful of questions could very well add up to an extra minute or two by the end of the section.

ANSWER: A

7. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following assertions regarding the early music recordings mentioned in the third paragraph?

Explanation

The important word in the stem is “recordings,” which directs us to para 3 in general. You’ll recall that this takes us to the first of two extended examples of what the author sees as a disturbing aspect of the early music movement, its tendency to separate the performance of music from the real life of a bygone day. The recordings in question feature an obtrusive piano thump-thumping the time; that piano is nominally “accurate,” because it did exist in the 1700s, but the fact that 18th-century audiences barely heard it (lines 42-46) means that it is accurate in name only; the recordings’ sound itself is quite different from the 18th-century sound. The sense is that in this respect the movement is crossing itself up, or as (D) puts it, performing music most Unlike the way it sounded at the time of its composition.

(A), (E) Both can be rejected out of hand because of their references to issues introduced later in para 3: tempo and “intensity and excitement,” respectively.

(B) seems to tie lines 3-6 together with para 3, resulting in an extremely weird statement. Where does “betray the influence” come from, and where is the passage ever concerned with influences on the advocates of early music? Strange.

(C) has it exactly backwards. By insisting on a instrument that was present in the 1700s and ending up with a sound that was not, the early music recordings are sacrificing “aesthetic integrity” for the sake of “historical authenticity.”

• The harder you have to work to justify an answer choice, the more likely it is to be incorrect. Study the context of the detail in question, but don’t wander too far from it. (Many wrong answers do just that.)

ANSWER: D

Hope it helps
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
51,882
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,882
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

Topic and Scope:

Early music; specifically, the movement to have music performed as it was performed when it was written.

Purpose and Main Idea:

The author’s purpose is to explore the “questions” raised by this movement (which she describes as resembling a “crusade”), and that the questions are “profound and troubling” (line 10) conveys her main idea.

Paragraph Structure:

Para 1 describes the early music movement, shoots it a little barb by way of the “crusade” reference, grants that the movement has been of value, and then presents the main-idea sentence that the rest of the passage follows up on: the “profound and troubling questions” raised by the movement. One would expect that what follows would explore at least some of those questions, and since two Paras follow, it’s not surprising that those questions are two in number. To make the structure even clearer, the author supplies the nice “continuation” Keyword phrase “in addition” at the beginning of Para 3 to essentially say “that was one problem; now here’s another.”

Para 2 explains that demanding that a piece be played on instruments available during its composition carries with it a built-in problem: What if a piece was composed with instruments in mind that hadn’t even been invented yet? In that case, performing the piece today on the earlier instrument that was available to the composer at the time would seem to degrade the artist’s vision. Beethoven’s first piano concerto is cited at length as one such piece.

Para 3 poses a different “troubling” issue, expressed generally in lines and illustrated by the tempo issue. The gist of it is that the conducting and setting of original tempos were both determined by different historical conditions from ours; and denying that amounts to “inadvertently [divorcing] music and its performance from . . . life”—something the author finds troubling and obviously opposes.

The Big Picture:

• Strive to become a good anticipatory reader. Consciously anticipate that when an author calls something “a crusade,” s/he may turn out to be critical of it. Consciously anticipate that when something “raises profound and troubling questions,” almost immediately those questions (at least one main one, and possibly even more than one) will be raised and addressed. Stay ahead of the author rather than several steps behind.

• The Beethoven example in Para 2, and the two tempo examples in Para 3, are pretty technical for non-musicians to understand. Content yourself with understanding them in broad outline (as discussed above), and delve deeper only when the questions seem to demand that you do so.

1. It can be inferred from the passage that by “a piano exactly contemporary” (Highlighted) with the composition of Beethoven’s first piano concerto, the author means the kind of piano that was

Explanation

Lines 23-24 appears in Para 2, whose purpose is to attack the assumption on the part of early music advocates that composers necessarily write for the instruments that exist at the time. Reread the whole deal, from line 16 on. A piano “exactly contemporary with” Beethoven’s first piano concerto would, we are told at the end, frustrate Beethoven. Sure, it would irritate him to have to play the “bad” F-natural, because the instrument of the time lacked the high F-sharp that existed only in the composer’s imagination and not on the instrument itself. As (D) has it, a piano contemporary with Beethoven’s first piano concerto would be incapable of playing the high F-sharp that the melody calls for. (Note that the actual score was written to accommodate the range of the limited piano—hence the “wrong” note, the high Fnatural that must have driven Ludwig batty.)

(A) The phenomenon of the inaudible time-keeping piano comes out of Para 3, and is not associated with either Beethoven or lines 23-24.

(B) Au contraire—check out lines 17-19 again. Pianos in Beethoven’s day lacked the F-sharp, not the F-natural.

(C) Mozart and Haydn appear only in Para 3, so there’s no reason to connect them to Para 2’s piano, and no reason to assume that all three composers couldn’t have used the same piano type.

(E) First of all, as far as we know, Beethoven only contemplated revising his earlier work. And besides, it wouldn’t have been the piano contemporary to the first concerto that would have prompted Beethoven’s revisions, but rather the more expansive and versatile piano that came later on.

• When a question mentions a line reference, be sure to think about the overall purpose of the para in which the line reference appears. Often, context is everything.
• Beware of choices that spring from details from the wrong part of the passage. (A) and (C) are good examples of this common wrong answer type.


Answer: D
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,413
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,413
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
496 posts
358 posts