Explanation
Topic and Scope:
Early music; specifically, the movement to have music performed as it was performed when it was written.
Purpose and Main Idea:
The author’s purpose is to explore the “questions” raised by this movement (which she describes as resembling a “crusade”), and that the questions are “profound and troubling” (line 10) conveys her main idea.
Paragraph Structure:
Para 1 describes the early music movement, shoots it a little barb by way of the “crusade” reference, grants that the movement has been of value, and then presents the main-idea sentence that the rest of the passage follows up on: the “profound and troubling questions” raised by the movement. One would expect that what follows would explore at least some of those questions, and since two Paras follow, it’s not surprising that those questions are two in number. To make the structure even clearer, the author supplies the nice “continuation” Keyword phrase “in addition” at the beginning of Para 3 to essentially say “that was one problem; now here’s another.”
Para 2 explains that demanding that a piece be played on instruments available during its composition carries with it a built-in problem: What if a piece was composed with instruments in mind that hadn’t even been invented yet? In that case, performing the piece today on the earlier instrument that was available to the composer at the time would seem to degrade the artist’s vision. Beethoven’s first piano concerto is cited at length as one such piece.
Para 3 poses a different “troubling” issue, expressed generally in lines and illustrated by the tempo issue. The gist of it is that the conducting and setting of original tempos were both determined by different historical conditions from ours; and denying that amounts to “inadvertently [divorcing] music and its performance from . . . life”—something the author finds troubling and obviously opposes.
The Big Picture:
• Strive to become a good anticipatory reader. Consciously anticipate that when an author calls something “a crusade,” s/he may turn out to be critical of it. Consciously anticipate that when something “raises profound and troubling questions,” almost immediately those questions (at least one main one, and possibly even more than one) will be raised and addressed. Stay ahead of the author rather than several steps behind.
• The Beethoven example in Para 2, and the two tempo examples in Para 3, are pretty technical for non-musicians to understand. Content yourself with understanding them in broad outline (as discussed above), and delve deeper only when the questions seem to demand that you do so.
1. It can be inferred from the passage that by “a piano exactly contemporary” (Highlighted) with the composition of Beethoven’s first piano concerto, the author means the kind of piano that was
Explanation
Lines 23-24 appears in Para 2, whose purpose is to attack the assumption on the part of early music advocates that composers necessarily write for the instruments that exist at the time. Reread the whole deal, from line 16 on. A piano “exactly contemporary with” Beethoven’s first piano concerto would, we are told at the end, frustrate Beethoven. Sure, it would irritate him to have to play the “bad” F-natural, because the instrument of the time lacked the high F-sharp that existed only in the composer’s imagination and not on the instrument itself. As (D) has it, a piano contemporary with Beethoven’s first piano concerto would be incapable of playing the high F-sharp that the melody calls for. (Note that the actual score was written to accommodate the range of the limited piano—hence the “wrong” note, the high Fnatural that must have driven Ludwig batty.)
(A) The phenomenon of the inaudible time-keeping piano comes out of Para 3, and is not associated with either Beethoven or lines 23-24.
(B) Au contraire—check out lines 17-19 again. Pianos in Beethoven’s day lacked the F-sharp, not the F-natural.
(C) Mozart and Haydn appear only in Para 3, so there’s no reason to connect them to Para 2’s piano, and no reason to assume that all three composers couldn’t have used the same piano type.
(E) First of all, as far as we know, Beethoven only contemplated revising his earlier work. And besides, it wouldn’t have been the piano contemporary to the first concerto that would have prompted Beethoven’s revisions, but rather the more expansive and versatile piano that came later on.
• When a question mentions a line reference, be sure to think about the overall purpose of the para in which the line reference appears. Often, context is everything.
• Beware of choices that spring from details from the wrong part of the passage. (A) and (C) are good examples of this common wrong answer type.
Answer: D