Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT 
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
01 Sep 2024, 04:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
ᅠᅠResearchers: Ethicists (philosophers of ethics) devote their careers to reflecting on morality and presumably care deeply about it. Moral reflection tends to promote moral behavior, and ethicists tend to be both more prone to and more skilled at moral reflection than non-ethicists. Given that the philosophical ethical theories of ethicists broadly agree with widely accepted moral standards, we expect that ethicists would tend to be better behaved than non-ethicists with regard to widely accepted moral standards.
ᅠᅠTo test this expectation we surveyed some of the attendees of a philosophical conference to assess whether people who have contact with ethicists believe that ethicists are, indeed, particularly well-behaved with regard to widely accepted moral standards. Respondents to the survey belonged to exactly one of two categories: ethicists and other philosophers (non- ethicists). Each was asked to evaluate the moral behavior of ethicists as compared to that of other philosophers and to that of non-academics. Each respondent provided an answer to each question in the survey.
ᅠᅠTo test this expectation we surveyed some of the attendees of a philosophical conference to assess whether people who have contact with ethicists believe that ethicists are, indeed, particularly well-behaved with regard to widely accepted moral standards. Respondents to the survey belonged to exactly one of two categories: ethicists and other philosophers (non- ethicists). Each was asked to evaluate the moral behavior of ethicists as compared to that of other philosophers and to that of non-academics. Each respondent provided an answer to each question in the survey.
35%
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
64% (02:40) correct
36%
(03:00)
wrong
based on 906
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Of the following percentages, which one is closest to the percent of the ethicist respondents who rated the moral behavior of ethicists as better than the moral behavior of other philosophers?
| 35% | |
| 40% | |
| 45% | |
| 50% | |
| 55% |
How many people attended the philosophical conference?: No
How many of the conference attendees were respondents to the survey?: Yes
How many respondents rated the moral behavior of ethicists as worse than the behavior of other philosophers?: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
71% (01:03) correct
29%
(01:09)
wrong
based on 909
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following questions, select Yes if that question can be answered using only the information provided. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| How many people attended the philosophical conference? | ||
| How many of the conference attendees were respondents to the survey? | ||
| How many respondents rated the moral behavior of ethicists as worse than the behavior of other philosophers? |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
How many people attended the philosophical conference?: No
How many of the conference attendees were respondents to the survey?: Yes
How many respondents rated the moral behavior of ethicists as worse than the behavior of other philosophers?: Yes
A majority reported that ethicists’ moral behavior was about the same as that of other philosophers.: No
They tend to be more skilled at moral reflection than are ethicists.: No
They were more likely to report better moral behavior by ethicists relative to the comparison groups than they were to report worse moral behavior.: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39% (02:01) correct
61%
(02:03)
wrong
based on 1118
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following statements about the non-ethicist philosophers surveyed, select Yes if it accurately reflects the information provided. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| A majority reported that ethicists’ moral behavior was about the same as that of other philosophers. | ||
| They tend to be more skilled at moral reflection than are ethicists. | ||
| They were more likely to report better moral behavior by ethicists relative to the comparison groups than they were to report worse moral behavior. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A majority reported that ethicists’ moral behavior was about the same as that of other philosophers.: No
They tend to be more skilled at moral reflection than are ethicists.: No
They were more likely to report better moral behavior by ethicists relative to the comparison groups than they were to report worse moral behavior.: Yes
Official Mock 6:
2024-09-01_14-56-31.png [ 101.49 KiB | Viewed 10197 times ]
Attachment:
2024-09-01_14-56-31.png [ 101.49 KiB | Viewed 10197 times ]
Trying to understand why the right answer is right?
GMAT Club Tests explanations walk through concepts, shortcuts, and common traps on many questions.
See how →
19 Sep 2024, 12:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1:
1. We are asked to find the "percent of the ethicist respondents who rated the moral behavior of ethicists as better than the moral behavior of other philosophers".
2. For the 1st column, we are comparing ethicists' behavior to other philosophers.
3. In the 2nd column, we are considering ethicist respondents.
4. The percent is equal to the number of responses in that row, which selected "Better", divided by the total amount of responses there. In other words, the percentage will equal \(\frac{12}{12+18+4} = \frac{12}{34} \approx 35\%\).
Question 2:
1. "How many people attended the philosophical conference?" If we look through the text, we can find that "we surveyed some of the attendees of a philosophical conference". This means that the data doesn't include the total number of attendees. So, there isn't enough information.
2. "How many of the conference attendees were respondents to the survey?" We can find this number by summing up either the top two rows with numbers, or the bottom two rows. So, there is enough information.
3. "How many respondents rated the moral behavior of ethicists as worse than the behavior of other philosophers?" Using a similar strategy as in Question 1, we can search the row with comparing to other philosophers and the column "Worse". We have two values - 4 and 13 - the sum of which is our answer. So, there is enough information.
Question 3:
1. "A majority reported that ethicists’ moral behavior was about the same as that of other philosophers". Here, we look at the row with comparing to other philosophers and the row with the respondent specialization as other philosophers. Now compare the sum of values in column "Same" with all responses. We get: \(\frac{18}{(15)+(18)+(13)} = \frac{18}{46} < \frac{23}{46} = 50\%\). So, the statement doesn't accurately reflect the information.
2. "They tend to be more skilled at moral reflection than are ethicists". However, the text says differently: "ethicists tend to be both more prone to and more skilled at moral reflection than non-ethicists". So, the statement doesn't accurately reflect the information.
3. "They were more likely to report better moral behavior by ethicists relative to the comparison groups than they were to report worse moral behavior". Let's consider the 2 rows with the respondent being other philosophers and compare the number of responses in the "Better" column to the "Worse" column. We get that the values are larger in the "Better" column: 15 > 13 and 19 > 11. So, the statement does accurately reflect the information.
1. We are asked to find the "percent of the ethicist respondents who rated the moral behavior of ethicists as better than the moral behavior of other philosophers".
2. For the 1st column, we are comparing ethicists' behavior to other philosophers.
3. In the 2nd column, we are considering ethicist respondents.
4. The percent is equal to the number of responses in that row, which selected "Better", divided by the total amount of responses there. In other words, the percentage will equal \(\frac{12}{12+18+4} = \frac{12}{34} \approx 35\%\).
Question 2:
1. "How many people attended the philosophical conference?" If we look through the text, we can find that "we surveyed some of the attendees of a philosophical conference". This means that the data doesn't include the total number of attendees. So, there isn't enough information.
2. "How many of the conference attendees were respondents to the survey?" We can find this number by summing up either the top two rows with numbers, or the bottom two rows. So, there is enough information.
3. "How many respondents rated the moral behavior of ethicists as worse than the behavior of other philosophers?" Using a similar strategy as in Question 1, we can search the row with comparing to other philosophers and the column "Worse". We have two values - 4 and 13 - the sum of which is our answer. So, there is enough information.
Question 3:
1. "A majority reported that ethicists’ moral behavior was about the same as that of other philosophers". Here, we look at the row with comparing to other philosophers and the row with the respondent specialization as other philosophers. Now compare the sum of values in column "Same" with all responses. We get: \(\frac{18}{(15)+(18)+(13)} = \frac{18}{46} < \frac{23}{46} = 50\%\). So, the statement doesn't accurately reflect the information.
2. "They tend to be more skilled at moral reflection than are ethicists". However, the text says differently: "ethicists tend to be both more prone to and more skilled at moral reflection than non-ethicists". So, the statement doesn't accurately reflect the information.
3. "They were more likely to report better moral behavior by ethicists relative to the comparison groups than they were to report worse moral behavior". Let's consider the 2 rows with the respondent being other philosophers and compare the number of responses in the "Better" column to the "Worse" column. We get that the values are larger in the "Better" column: 15 > 13 and 19 > 11. So, the statement does accurately reflect the information.
General Discussion
26 Sep 2024, 04:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bismuth83
I believe in Q3 in the first statement, we merely are focussing on the non-ethicist philosophers surveyed, like it is stated in the prompt. It would still be a NO but the calculation should be 18/46. Correct?
