Bunuel
Because they can craft objects of a new design without having extrusion fittings custom-designed for that purpose,
3D printers have an application in building prototypes of new models of objects long before those new models are on production lines, and it was on this basis that they first captured the interest of the market. However, suitability for prototyping does not limit 3D printers to prototyping, and in fact their capability to craft items without specialized fittings for each design can allow them, in essence, to be the production line.
3D printers have this natural application to mass-production in part because they can produce items at a cost competitive with that of production lines.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first and the second each describe evidence that has been used to challenge the position that the argument seeks to establish.
B. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
C. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is a consideration that is introduced to counter the force of that evidence.
D. The first and the second each provide evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish.
E. The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
Official Explanation
Reading the question: we see boldfaced sentences, so we're certain that the question will involve identifying the logical roles of the sentences. We confirm this by checking out the question stem. Then we will go through the argument and identify the logical role of each sentence, not bothering to analyze the argument further.
Sentence
Starts With.../Includes...
Function
1st
"3D printers have an application"
Evidence, evidence
2nd
"However, suitability for prototyping"
Partial contradiction
3rd
"3D printers have this natural application"
Support to the partial contradiction
Creating a filter: the word "however" signals a shift in perspective. Both boldfaced portions are supporting statements; the first supports the first opinion (which is implicit), and the second supports the second opinion, which contradicts the first to some degree. We have our answer prediction.
Applying the filter: (A), (D), and (E) all express the statements as on the same side of the argument, so they are all out. We're left with (B) and (C). We can see (B) is wrong because of its latter portion; the second boldfaced statement does not express a position, but rather an explanation supporting the second position. So (C) must be the answer. We can confirm this. The "position that the argument seeks to establish" is that 3D printers can function as a production line. Indeed, the first statement is the basis for the first opinion, the objection to the idea that the 3D printers can be the production line. And the second, though we might not have phrased it in this way, is a consideration that is introduced to counter of the force of that evidence--namely, they can be mass-production even though they are good at prototyping.
The correct answer is (C).