Hi gmatcat8,You're asking to see the full absolute-value case method spelled out, so let me lay all four cases side by side. The idea is simple: each absolute value splits into a
plus and a
minus version, and since there are two equations, that's
2 × 2 = 4 systems to test.
The two splits are:
- x − 2y = 5
or x − 2y = −5
- 2x − y = 11
or 2x − y = −11
Solving each pairingA quick trick for all four: double the first equation to get 2x − 4y, then subtract it from the second to knock out x and leave 3y.
Case 1: x − 2y = 5, 2x − y = 11
- 3y = 11 − 10 = 1 - y =
1/3. Not an integer. ✗
Case 2: x − 2y = 5, 2x − y = −11
- 3y = −11 − 10 = −21 - y =
−7, x =
−9.
Check: |−9 + 14| =
5 ✓ and |−18 + 7| =
11 ✓. So xy = (−9)(−7) =
63. ✓
Case 3: x − 2y = −5, 2x − y = 11
- 3y = 11 + 10 = 21 - y =
7, x =
9. So xy = (9)(7) =
63. ✓
Case 4: x − 2y = −5, 2x − y = −11
- 3y = −11 + 10 = −1 - y =
−1/3. Not an integer. ✗
Notice the pattern: the two
same-sign pairings (both +, both -) fail the integer test, and the two
opposite-sign pairings both land on xy =
63. That's why the answer is locked in as
D, and why you never even needed to worry about which of Cases
2 or
3 is "the" solution - they agree.
The key discipline here is to write out
all four sign combinations and let the
integer condition filter them, exactly as Dereno did above.
Answer: Dgmatcat8
Hey Kevin, could you please show another way of solving this by checking cases with absolute values?