Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 09:03 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 09:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
michaellee518
Joined: 20 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chs123
Joined: 02 Feb 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: Brazil
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q73 V84 DI78
GMAT Focus 2: 605 Q77 V83 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 605 Q77 V83 DI80
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
michaellee518
Joined: 20 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,155
Own Kudos:
83,723
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,679
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,155
Kudos: 83,723
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Very nice tool. Kudos for building it! Looks like a lot of detail. I am a bit overwhelmed though. :angel:
The challenge is that there are a lot of MBA ROI calculators (we even had someone build one on GMAT Club) and tools that offer OK-enough details and any AI agent can get me some of the details so it may be tough to monetize though I think some people can definitely benefit from it and use it more like a research tool - comparing outcomes/etc.
User avatar
michaellee518
Joined: 20 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OK, thanks for the feedback.
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,241
Own Kudos:
1,722
 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,241
Kudos: 1,722
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You've built something genuinely differentiated. Most ROI calculators treat geography as an afterthought, but for a huge chunk of applicants (especially from Asia, Middle East, and increasingly Europe) the decision to return home or stay in the West is the single biggest financial variable. Modeling that properly matters.

The monetization challenge is real, though. The issue isn't that $14 is too high. It's that most applicants don't discover they need this level of detail until they're deep in the decision process, often after they've already used a free tool that felt good enough. By the time someone realizes the generic calculator missed their actual scenario, they've anchored on a conclusion.

Two levers worth considering: one is positioning this less as a calculator and more as a decision audit for people choosing between admits. That's when granularity has the highest perceived value. The other is thinking about who else has budget and incentive to get this right. Some employers sponsor MBAs and care deeply about retention and ROI modeling. Some career coaches or admissions consultants might white-label a version. You've built the hard part already.

What does usage look like so far?

michaellee518
I'm an INSEAD alum, spent the last few weeks building the MBA ROI tool I wished existed when I was applying. Every calculator I found assumed you were going to New York or London. Half my cohort went back to Shanghai, Singapore, Mumbai, Dubai — and none of the tools modeled what actually happens to those people financially.
So I built it. Free to use for your first scenario. No signup. No email required to get a verdict.

Link:
https://trade.pgintel.dev/mba-fit


What it covers:

  • 21 top programs across three tiers — European elite (INSEAD, IMD, LBS), US Top 15 (HBS, Stanford, Wharton, Booth, Columbia, Kellogg, MIT Sloan, Yale, Tuck, Ross, Stern, Haas, Darden, Fuqua, Anderson), Asian top (NUS, CEIBS, HKUST)
  • 8 career tracks — MBB, Tier-2 consulting, IB, PE/VC, LDP, Marketing, Tech/PM, Startup
  • 41 post-MBA cities including the ones usually ignored in Western tools: Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Mumbai, Bangalore, Bangkok, Tel Aviv, Dubai, Taipei
  • Year-by-year comp progression using median promotion multipliers, not top-quartile — this is the #1 calibration error I see in other tools
  • Lifestyle coverage — can your actual take-home comp fund an "affluent" life in that city (housekeeper, international schooling, decent apartment)
  • Brutal insights with citations when the math says your plan doesn't work
The finding that surprised me most:
An MBB Associate at McKinsey Shanghai clears ~$215k total comp. Same role at McKinsey NYC clears ~$275k. NYC pays 28% more on paper.
But:
  • Shanghai on $215k = 115% coverage of "affluent" lifestyle (live-in ayi, international school for 2 kids, nice apartment in Jing'an district, regular travel)
  • NYC on $275k = 46% coverage of equivalent lifestyle in Manhattan
That's not an expat package — that's local-hire comp (Chinese national returning from abroad, or an overseas hire on local terms). The purchasing-power gap is real and none of the existing tools show it.
Same pattern broadly holds: LDP in Shanghai vs Miami, IB in Mumbai vs London, Tech/PM in Bangalore vs SF. Asia wins on immediate lifestyle; US wins on long-term wealth compounding. The tool tries to tell you which matters more for your specific case.
What it honestly won't do:
  • Doesn't know your specific offer — uses school averages. Top-quartile performers beat the modeled trajectory by 1.2-1.4×; strugglers undershoot
  • Doesn't factor H-1B friction for Indians staying in US (adding next week)
  • Figures are directional medians — verify with your school's career office before enrolling
Free tier gives you:
One full scenario with verdict, promotion curve, life simulator, brutal insights, 10-year wealth arc. If you want to compare scenarios side-by-side, unlock the full engine + 8-page PDF report for $14 (early-bird — first 100 users). After that it's $19.

I kept the price deliberately low because the honest feedback loop matters more than the margin right now.
Why I built this:
I wanted it for myself a few years ago. Writing the logic forced me to be honest about things I'd have rationalized away — tech MBAs to SF really do come out ahead long-term if you stay (but most people don't stay). LDP in Europe is comp-underwhelming but life-rich. IB in HK is brutal but the carry math is real.
Happy to answer questions about methodology, data sources (INSEAD/LBS/IMD/HBS/Wharton/Booth employment reports, Transparent Career, Levels.fyi, WSO bonus threads, Numbeo for CoL), or why I made specific modeling choices.
If you try it and think a number is wrong, tell me — I'd rather fix it than defend it.
User avatar
michaellee518
Joined: 20 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for this.

A lot of consumer interest but thinking through what's the right business model. I think the B2B route is the right route. I spent the last 14 hours to rebrand and rebuild this. payback.pgintel.dev.

GyanOne
You've built something genuinely differentiated. Most ROI calculators treat geography as an afterthought, but for a huge chunk of applicants (especially from Asia, Middle East, and increasingly Europe) the decision to return home or stay in the West is the single biggest financial variable. Modeling that properly matters.

The monetization challenge is real, though. The issue isn't that $14 is too high. It's that most applicants don't discover they need this level of detail until they're deep in the decision process, often after they've already used a free tool that felt good enough. By the time someone realizes the generic calculator missed their actual scenario, they've anchored on a conclusion.

Two levers worth considering: one is positioning this less as a calculator and more as a decision audit for people choosing between admits. That's when granularity has the highest perceived value. The other is thinking about who else has budget and incentive to get this right. Some employers sponsor MBAs and care deeply about retention and ROI modeling. Some career coaches or admissions consultants might white-label a version. You've built the hard part already.

What does usage look like so far?


User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,155
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,679
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,155
Kudos: 83,723
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow! awesome job rebuilding things so quickly - power of modern world!

I agree that giving so much information is really the differentiator, esp if someone can compare US vs. Europe vs. Asia for example. That's quite powerful.