Last visit was: 01 Sep 2026, 06:54 It is currently 01 Sep 2026, 06:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,128
Own Kudos:
1,096
 [6]
Given Kudos: 847
Products:
Posts: 1,128
Kudos: 1,096
 [6]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Riyaagoell
Joined: 01 Sep 2025
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 19
Given Kudos: 16
Products:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 1,809
Own Kudos:
14,272
 [3]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,809
Kudos: 14,272
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,263
Own Kudos:
33,879
 [1]
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,263
Kudos: 33,879
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Riyaagoell,

The question asks which choice does the least to help, and the conclusion is narrow: Shakespeare came to know Alcestis through a Latin translation. A choice strengthens only if it makes that route more likely.

Why B strengthens, so it cannot be the answer. B says the only English version "differed drastically from the original in ways The Winter's Tale does not." That kills the rival source. If the play cannot have come from the English text, and Greek is already ruled out, the Latin route is left standing. Eliminating an alternative is a form of strengthening.

Why A is the least. A contains the word "Latin," so it feels like support. Read what it actually says: "Latin phrases that were widely used in England... appear in a number of his plays." That shows he picked up common Latin phrases circulating in England. It does not show he could sit down and read a full Latin translation of a Greek tragedy, and it never connects him to one for Alcestis. True, but it moves nothing.

That is the whole difference: B removes a competing explanation, while A only sounds on-topic because of one word.

Had A said "Shakespeare could fluently read and translate long Latin texts," it would strengthen, because it supplies the reading ability the conclusion needs. As written, restricted to common phrases, it supplies none.

Watch for choices that echo a keyword from the conclusion without moving the logic.

Answer: A

Riyaagoell
Please post an explanation as to how did we conclude on A instead of B
User avatar
Hellohello007
Joined: 21 Jun 2026
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, Can someone please tell why not D, as D suggests, if he probably took Latin classes it means he did not need a translation

Is the argument implying that the play was in Greek and he came to know of it through a trnaslation in Latin (the argument in drawing this conclusion assumes that he knew latin)??

Can someone please elaborate?
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 1,809
Own Kudos:
14,272
 [3]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,809
Kudos: 14,272
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hellohello007
Hi, Can someone please tell why not D, as D suggests, if he probably took Latin classes it means he did not need a translation

Is the argument implying that the play was in Greek and he came to know of it through a trnaslation in Latin (the argument in drawing this conclusion assumes that he knew latin)??

Can someone please elaborate?
Yes, that is exactly the point. The original play was in Greek, while the proposed source was a Latin translation.

So (D) strengthens the argument because studying Latin at grammar school makes it more plausible that Shakespeare could actually read the Latin translation. It does not mean he could read the Greek original.

(A) is weaker because merely using a few common Latin phrases does not show that Shakespeare knew enough Latin to read an entire translated play.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
704 posts