Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2206:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Let’s dive deep into advanced CR to ace GMAT Focus! Join this webinar to unlock the secrets to conquering Boldface and Paradox questions with expert insights and strategies. Elevate your skills and boost your GMAT Verbal Score now!
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 03 Aug 2019, 23:36
Originally posted by Chetangupta on 11 Jul 2011, 13:28.
Last edited by Bunuel on 03 Aug 2019, 23:36, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 03 Aug 2019, 23:36, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
58% (02:25) correct
42%
(02:18)
wrong
based on 598
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Ignoring minor crimes such as littering and vandalism promotes a general air of lawlessness that fosters more serious crime. In addition, when people who commit these crimes are arrested, they are often found to have outstanding warrants for more serious offenses. Over the last 5 years, the Macropolis police department prosecuted these minor crimes that were previously ignored in order to reduce serious crime. For each of those 5 years, serious crime has declined in the city, a clear indication that the policy is working.
Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute the Chief of Police's claims?
A. Some other cities have implemented an identical program without a corresponding drop in serious crime.
B. Illegal drug use — which is associated with high levels of serious crime — has fallen dramatically in Macropolis.
C. Most serious criminals are young men, and the proportion of young men in the population has risen.
D. A general upturn in Macropolis's economy has led to large decreases in unemployment, which in the past has led to reductions in serious crime.
E. Harsher sentencing policies introduced into the state 10 years ago mean that many career criminals are currently serving long jail sentences.
Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute the Chief of Police's claims?
A. Some other cities have implemented an identical program without a corresponding drop in serious crime.
B. Illegal drug use — which is associated with high levels of serious crime — has fallen dramatically in Macropolis.
C. Most serious criminals are young men, and the proportion of young men in the population has risen.
D. A general upturn in Macropolis's economy has led to large decreases in unemployment, which in the past has led to reductions in serious crime.
E. Harsher sentencing policies introduced into the state 10 years ago mean that many career criminals are currently serving long jail sentences.
12 Jul 2011, 17:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Chetangupta,
The first step with Critical Reasoning questions is always to read the question and determine what the question is really asking. In this case, the question is written in a purposefully confusing way:
"Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute the Chief of Police's claims?"
As you read this and think about the major types of CR questions (strengthen, weaken, ID the underlying assumption, and draw a conclusion), you should notice this question is about weakening the argument. It's really asking you which answer choice weakens the conclusion the least. The conclusion is that prosecuting people for small crimes leads to decreased crime overall).
Once you rephrase this into an easier to comprehend question type, take a look at the answers:
A would weaken or be irrelevant to the Chief's claim...it says that this hasn't worked in other cities.
B would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
C - If this were true, the crime rate should have actually gone up, which would actually strengthen the argument.
D would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
E would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
The one that weakens the arguments the least is C, as C actually strengthens the argument.
Tough question!
Brett
The first step with Critical Reasoning questions is always to read the question and determine what the question is really asking. In this case, the question is written in a purposefully confusing way:
"Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute the Chief of Police's claims?"
As you read this and think about the major types of CR questions (strengthen, weaken, ID the underlying assumption, and draw a conclusion), you should notice this question is about weakening the argument. It's really asking you which answer choice weakens the conclusion the least. The conclusion is that prosecuting people for small crimes leads to decreased crime overall).
Once you rephrase this into an easier to comprehend question type, take a look at the answers:
A would weaken or be irrelevant to the Chief's claim...it says that this hasn't worked in other cities.
B would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
C - If this were true, the crime rate should have actually gone up, which would actually strengthen the argument.
D would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
E would weaken the conclusion by providing an alternate explanation for decreased crime.
The one that weakens the arguments the least is C, as C actually strengthens the argument.
Tough question!
Brett
General Discussion
12 Jul 2011, 13:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
My answer would be C.
Read the question carefully, Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute.
A : Evidence that same theory was successful in different cities : supports the claim
B : Supports the claim
C : Least likely to be used to dispute
D : more employment less crime. Supports the claim.
E : Supports the claim
Read the question carefully, Which of the following, if true, would be LEAST likely to be used to dispute.
A : Evidence that same theory was successful in different cities : supports the claim
B : Supports the claim
C : Least likely to be used to dispute
D : more employment less crime. Supports the claim.
E : Supports the claim
