Add another vote to Manhattan
Here are my takeaways for Manhattan CAT
Quantitative:
> The questions are more time-consuming and calculation-heavy. I think, however, that the makers of the
Manhattan GMAT purposely do this to strengthen our timing.
> The questions are very similar with the GMAT in terms of placing "traps" in the questions. Case in point, I encountered a
MGMAT CAT quant question that asked to determine the number of hours before the tank is filled up 1/2 of its capacity. That's very GMAT-esque. I and give kudos to
MGMAT for that.
> The explanations are crisp and straight to the point. Matter of fact, the explanations are narrated in such a way that reading them feels like a real teacher is explaining them.
Verbal:
> Verbal questions are very hard to imitate in my opinion. See,
MGMAT verbal is a bit easier than GMAT questions. I don't know why. Hope someone could take chime in on this.
Overall, I find
MGMAT very very vital.