thevenus
Sales of a new chocolate bar were considerably
boosted recently by an advertisement that featured a classic rock song. The candy manufacturer's decision to also use classic rock songs in commercials for its older and more popular products, in the hopes of boosting profits, is
[color=#ff0000] NOT based on the assumption that[/color] ___________________.
A. thanks to the new advertising strategy, all of the company's older products will sell at least as well as the new chocolate bar.
B. sales of a particular product can be increased by a memorable or catchy advertisement campaign.
C. use of classic rock songs will be more commercially effective than the advertising techniques currently used by the company for its older products
D. the majority of customers who buy one kind of candy bar from the company will not stop buying other candy bars made by the same company.
E. the licensing costs associated with using classic rock songs in commercials will be substantially offset by the increased profits resulting from those commercials.
Let's discuss, OA/OE after some discussions.
The argument is:
Advertisement featuring old classic song =
boost in sales of new chocolate bar.
Hence,
classic rock songs in commercials for older and more popular products =
boost in profits (An important point worth noting is that it says commercials for old products will boost profits, not necessarily sales or profits of the product for which the advertisement is rolled out. The answer choices doesn't play with this - But it's useful to note down such technicalities in advance. You may ignore this for the answer purpose)
Now the question is:
The decision to boost profit by using classic rock songs in commercials for older and more popular products is
NOT based on the assumption that
Don't approach it as a "Which one of the following logically completes........" question.
We have to find the
answer choice that is either an
irrelevant assumption or undermines the argument.
A) Correct -
thanks to the new advertising strategy, all of the company's older products will sell at least as well as the new chocolate bar.
This states that
because of the new advertising strategy the old products will sell atleast as well as the new choc bar. Why would a new campaign be required, if the current one has already done so much? This clearly can't be the reason/assumption behind the campaign.
B) Incorrect - Sales of a particular product can be increased by a memorable or catchy advertisement campaign. This can be an assumption. This assumption certifies that increase in sales of new CB was not a coincidence and can be replicated across products.
C) Incorrect - Use of classic rock songs will be more commercially effective than the advertising techniques currently used by the company for its older products. This assumption states that the new strategy will be more effective than the existing one.
D) Incorrect - The majority of customers who buy one kind of candy bar from the company will not stop buying other candy bars made by the same company. This assumption states that a new campaign will create fresh sales and not just cannabalise sales from an existing product.
E) Incorrect - The licensing costs associated with using classic rock songs in commercials will be substantially offset by the increased profits resulting from those commercials. This assumption doesn't need any elaboration, it clearly strengthens the argument!
Revenue due to increased sales
> Cost of campaign
=> Net Positive
Profit.
What's the source of OA, are you sure it's correct?