Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 15:19 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 15:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
danzig
Joined: 11 Aug 2012
Last visit: 07 Nov 2014
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
386
 [81]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 103
Kudos: 386
 [81]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
71
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,879
 [26]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,879
 [26]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,879
 [14]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,879
 [14]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
AtlanticGMAT
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Last visit: 17 Sep 2025
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
645
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
GMAT 1: 760 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Posts: 255
Kudos: 645
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I think that Mike's explanation is great. I'm just wondering where this question came from? The wording seems strange to the point that the question may not be solvable. Here is the potentially problematic wording: distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9

What does that mean? Does that mean single digit INTEGERS between 0 and 9 or just single digit numbers. My assumption is that single digit numbers between 0 and 9 are not just "the digits" but could include the single digit decimals .1,.2,.3.... Anyone?

I guess that if you assume that the question includes the extra decimals then Mike's solution still works although I'm curious about whether this is an official question.

HG.
avatar
cking6178
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 590 Q34 V38
GPA: 3.56
WE:Analyst (Consumer Packaged Goods)
GMAT 1: 590 Q34 V38
Posts: 6
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HerrGrau
Hi,

I think that Mike's explanation is great. I'm just wondering where this question came from? The wording seems strange to the point that the question may not be solvable. Here is the potentially problematic wording: distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9

What does that mean? Does that mean single digit INTEGERS between 0 and 9 or just single digit numbers. My assumption is that single digit numbers between 0 and 9 are not just "the digits" but could include the single digit decimals .1,.2,.3.... Anyone?

I guess that if you assume that the question includes the extra decimals then Mike's solution still works although I'm curious about whether this is an official question.

HG.

It's tagged as a grockit problem, so I would guess that this is not an official question. It is also tagged as a 600-700 lvl question, which seems high to me for this question...I don't have any experience with Grockit, but MGMAT questions that are in the 600-700 range tend to be more difficult for me to solve.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,879
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HerrGrau
Hi,
The wording seems strange to the point that the question may not be solvable. Here is the potentially problematic wording: distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9 What does that mean? Does that mean single digit INTEGERS between 0 and 9 or just single digit numbers. My assumption is that single digit numbers between 0 and 9 are not just "the digits" but could include the single digit decimals .1,.2,.3.... Anyone?
Dear HerrGrau
Thank you for your kind words. :-)

In my experience, I have never heard "single digit numbers" apply to anything other than non-negative integers. I have never seen any book or hear anyone ever refer to, say, -5 or 0.008 or 3 x 10^8 as a "single digit number. Yes, technically, each of these is written with a single non-zero digit, but I have never heard the term "single digit number" used for them. (We could say that each of these has "one significant figure", but that carries us far afield into measurement theory, well beyond GMAT territory.)

In my mind, the only ambiguity in this question is whether zero is included --- I guess I was assuming, whatever their understanding of the term, this understanding would be fixed and wouldn't change as we moved through the statements of the DS ---- therefore, with both statements, and with whatever convention they are following, the question can be definitely answered.

I agree with you ---- this question is not written with the tight precision so characteristic of official GMAT questions. The very fact that there's any ambiguity at all makes this a woefully substandard question.

Mike :-)
User avatar
AtlanticGMAT
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Last visit: 17 Sep 2025
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
GMAT 1: 760 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Posts: 255
Kudos: 645
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mike,

In general I agree with everything that you're saying. Just to clarify, I think that .008 is a three digit number with 2 unique digits and so would be excluded. The numbers in question are .1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, and .9. They are numbers that have only one digit and hence are "single digit numbers". I have never seen this distinction be an actual issue on a GMAT question but am curious as to what the general consensus is.

HG.
User avatar
usre123
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 73
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
just for the sake of understanding, how would we solve this question?
1- probability of matching none - prob of matching 1?
none= (5/9)*4/9*3/9*2/9

probability of matching one: 1*5/9*4/9*3/9

is this the way?

Thank you!
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,000
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

A lottery is played by selecting X distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9 at once such that order does not matter. What is the probability that a player will win playing the lottery?

1) Players must match at least two numbers to win.

(2) X = 4

There are 2 variables (x and how many to be win) and 2 equations are given, so there is high chance (C) will be the answer.
Looking at the conditions together,
the probability to win is 1-(10C4/10^4), which is unique and makes the condition sufficient,
and the answer becomes (C).

For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
avatar
profileusername
Joined: 02 Feb 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
GMAT 1: 690 Q43 V41
GMAT 1: 690 Q43 V41
Posts: 75
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
danzig
A lottery is played by selecting X distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9 at once such that order does not matter. What is the probability that a player will win playing the lottery?
(1) Players must match at least two numbers to win.
(2) X = 4
I'm happy to help. :-)

This is a somewhat offbeat question, but then again, that's just what the GMAT will throw at you.

So, from the prompt, we know we are picking X different single digit numbers: X must be greater than two and less than 9 (or 10, if we are counting zero as a "single digit number" ----- let's ignore that complication). Order doesn't matter. We know nothing about what constitutes winning.

Statement #1: Players must match at least two numbers to win.
Now, at least we know what constitutes winning. The trouble is --- we don't know the how many digits are picked. If X = 9 ---- the lottery picks all the digits from 1-9, then I also pick all the digits from 1-9 --- then I have 100% chance of matching at least two digits and winning. That wouldn't be much of a lottery. If X = 3 --- the lottery picks three, and then I pick three --- well, that's harder. Clearly the probability of winning depends on the value of X, and we don't know that in Statement #1. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Statement #2: X = 4
Now, we know how many digits are picked ---- lottery picks 4, then I pick 4 --- but now I have no idea what constitutes "winning". (This is an example of a DS question in which it's crucially important to forget all about Statement #1 when we are analyzing Statement #2 on its own.) In Statement #2, we know how many digits are picked, but we have absolutely no idea what constitutes winning. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Combined statements:
Now, we know --- the lottery picks 4 digits, then I pick 4 digits, and if at least two of my digits match two of the lottery's cards, I win. This is now a well defined math problem, and if we wanted, we could calculate the numerical value of the probability. Of course, since this is DS, it would be a big mistake to waste time with that calculation. We have enough information now. Combined, the statements are sufficient.

Answer = C

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)

Excellent explanation. I was wondering how can we calculate the probability for winning the lottery with the given information. We know it's sufficient but what's the actual solution if this question was a PS problem.

Thank you.
avatar
twokliks
Joined: 12 Sep 2018
Last visit: 01 Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 4
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
TheMastermind
Excellent explanation. I was wondering how can we calculate the probability for winning the lottery with the given information. We know it's sufficient but what's the actual solution if this question was a PS problem.

Thank you.
Dear TheMastermind,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Just so we are clear, here would be the PS version of the problem:
A lottery is played by selecting 4 distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9 at once such that order does not matter. The lottery machine also picks four digits in the same way. Players must match at least two numbers with the machine to win. What is the probability that a player will win playing the lottery?

Think about it this way. I pick four of the digits at random. That's fixed. Now, the lottery machine is going to pick four digits at random. Here, I will use "at least" logic in the calculation. That is, for ease and convenient, we will calculate the probabilities of all the cases not included in the solution.

Case I: the machine's four choices don't overlap at all with mine.
There are four digits, my chosen digits, that the machine can't pick. The machine has to pick from the remaining six digits:
first choice P = 6/10 = 3/5
second choice P = 5/9
third choice P = 4/8 = 1/2
fourth choice = 3/7

\(P_1 = \dfrac{3}{5} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{3}{7}\)

\(P_1 = \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{7} = \dfrac{1}{14}\)

That's the Case I probability.

Case II: the machine's four choices overlap with exactly one digit of mine.

First, there's the one digit that matches one of mine: this could be made on any of the four choices. The other three choices follow the pattern above. The choices of the matching digit in the terms below is the first in the first line, the second in the second line, etc.

\(P_2 = \dfrac{4}{10} \times \dfrac{6}{9} \times \dfrac{5}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{4}{9} \times \dfrac{5}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{4}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{4}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)

\(P_2 = \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{2}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{7}\)

\(P_2 = \dfrac{4*2}{3*7} = \dfrac{8}{21}\)

That's the Case II probability.

Add those two:

\(P_{1,2} = \dfrac{1}{14} + \dfrac{8}{21} = \dfrac{3}{42} + \dfrac{16}{42} = \dfrac{19}{42}\)

That's the complete probability of condition of the question not being satisfied, so we subtract that from 1 to answer the question.

\(P = 1 - \dfrac{19}{42} = \dfrac{23}{42}\)

That's the answer to the question. This would be an extremely challenging PS. So far as I can tell, there's not a significantly short solution than the one I have shown.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi Mike,

I know this is DS, so we do not need to solve, but I was able to come up with the same solution, using the following method - is there anything done incorrectly?

1. Total possible machine selections: 10C4 = 210

2. Total possible human selections where no numbers match (choose any 4 from the remaining 6 numbers the machine did not select): 6C4 = 15

3. Total possible human selections where 1 number matches (choose one of the 4 numbers selected by machine x 3 of the unselected numbers): 4 x 6C3 = 4 x 20 = 80

Probability that human does not win: 1- (combined losing selections/total possible machine selections) = 1 - ((15+80)/210) = 1 - 19/42 = 23/42
User avatar
Cuttlefish
Joined: 02 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 21
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
TheMastermind
Excellent explanation. I was wondering how can we calculate the probability for winning the lottery with the given information. We know it's sufficient but what's the actual solution if this question was a PS problem.

Thank you.
Dear TheMastermind,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Just so we are clear, here would be the PS version of the problem:
A lottery is played by selecting 4 distinct single digit numbers from 0 to 9 at once such that order does not matter. The lottery machine also picks four digits in the same way. Players must match at least two numbers with the machine to win. What is the probability that a player will win playing the lottery?

Think about it this way. I pick four of the digits at random. That's fixed. Now, the lottery machine is going to pick four digits at random. Here, I will use "at least" logic in the calculation. That is, for ease and convenient, we will calculate the probabilities of all the cases not included in the solution.

Case I: the machine's four choices don't overlap at all with mine.
There are four digits, my chosen digits, that the machine can't pick. The machine has to pick from the remaining six digits:
first choice P = 6/10 = 3/5
second choice P = 5/9
third choice P = 4/8 = 1/2
fourth choice = 3/7

\(P_1 = \dfrac{3}{5} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{3}{7}\)

\(P_1 = \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{7} = \dfrac{1}{14}\)

That's the Case I probability.

Case II: the machine's four choices overlap with exactly one digit of mine.

First, there's the one digit that matches one of mine: this could be made on any of the four choices. The other three choices follow the pattern above. The choices of the matching digit in the terms below is the first in the first line, the second in the second line, etc.

\(P_2 = \dfrac{4}{10} \times \dfrac{6}{9} \times \dfrac{5}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{4}{9} \times \dfrac{5}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{4}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{6}{10} \times \dfrac{5}{9} \times \dfrac{4}{8} \times \dfrac{4}{7}\)

\(P_2 = \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{2}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{7}\)
\(+ \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{1}{3} \times \dfrac{1}{1} \times \dfrac{2}{7}\)

\(P_2 = \dfrac{4*2}{3*7} = \dfrac{8}{21}\)

That's the Case II probability.

Add those two:

\(P_{1,2} = \dfrac{1}{14} + \dfrac{8}{21} = \dfrac{3}{42} + \dfrac{16}{42} = \dfrac{19}{42}\)

That's the complete probability of condition of the question not being satisfied, so we subtract that from 1 to answer the question.

\(P = 1 - \dfrac{19}{42} = \dfrac{23}{42}\)

That's the answer to the question. This would be an extremely challenging PS. So far as I can tell, there's not a significantly short solution than the one I have shown.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Hi Mike,
Can you explain why we need to consider in which position the overlap happens in calculating P2? I thought order does not matter
Thank you.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
810,664
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,664
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Cuttlefish
Hi Mike,
Can you explain why we need to consider in which position the overlap happens in calculating P2? I thought order does not matter
Thank you.

Posted from my mobile device
­
The notion that order doesn't matter in this context refers to the fact that your chosen numbers simply need to match the winning numbers, regardless of their sequence. For instance, if the winning numbers are 2, 4, 6, and 8, any combination of these four numbers ensures a win.

However, when calculating the probability of picking the numbers, we need to consider that, even though 2, 4, 6, and 8 are the winning numbers, they could be selected in various orders that should be accounted for in caclulations.

Thus, those are two different 'orders' there!­
User avatar
Cuttlefish
Joined: 02 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 21
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Bunuel!
I get it now. The four ways to pick a combination with exactly one overlap are mutually exclusive events and hence need to be added to arrive at the overall probability of the events where there's exactly one overlap.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,966
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109754 posts
498 posts
212 posts