Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 Oct 2024, 05:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
I initially got this wrong and marked C, but now I see why D is the right answer:
Let's focus on the arguement at hand:
A developer wants to build a shopping mall in a mostly rural area of a mid-sized city. In the letter to the city council requesting a building permit, the developer argues that the permit should be granted because the shopping mall, if successful, will ultimately benefit the city by creating jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than the national average.
Ok, intersting wording! Focus on the bold portion and especially look there is "if successful". We are talking about only 1 case! The malls are successful!
Coming to answer choices
A) Irrelevant to reasoning. This may demonstrate that local residents support the mall, but it does not necessarily aid the developer’s position before the city council.
B) Irrelevant to reasoning. City building codes are not relevant to the discussion of whether a new shopping mall will benefit the city financially.
C) Irrelevant (as we are only talking about when it is successful). This choice is a trap, because it indicates some kind of assurance that the mall will work, but that's something that should not be our focus here. Our real focus needs to be on strengthening the developer’s petition before the city council (i.e if malls are successful then these areas that are having high unemployment will benefit) Not whether the mall will be successful or not! I hope this helps as I saw a lot of confusion here on the forum
D) Correct Oh this is interesting! I will like to mark this as "the angel is in the details" in my error log!
"A developer wants to build a shopping mall in a mostly rural area of a mid-sized city." while in his argument the developer says "will ultimately benefit the city by creating jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than the national average."
In a mid-sized city there are some prosperous places (where unemployment rate is less than the national average) and some not so prosperous places (where unemployment rate is higher than the national average) what a mix!
Then the developer's arguement has assumed that they are building in the less prosperous areas which will benefit if the mall is successful! Otherwise the arguement goes for a toss!
Think about the option "The city’s largest percentage of unemployed people lives in the rural area where the proposed shopping mall would be built." This tells us we are avoiding those prosperous areas! A Clear Srengthener!
E) Irrelevant to reasoning. This answer choice, though provides a good argument, falls outside of the scope of the original statement.
Hope this helps!
Let's focus on the arguement at hand:
A developer wants to build a shopping mall in a mostly rural area of a mid-sized city. In the letter to the city council requesting a building permit, the developer argues that the permit should be granted because the shopping mall, if successful, will ultimately benefit the city by creating jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than the national average.
Ok, intersting wording! Focus on the bold portion and especially look there is "if successful". We are talking about only 1 case! The malls are successful!
Coming to answer choices
A) Irrelevant to reasoning. This may demonstrate that local residents support the mall, but it does not necessarily aid the developer’s position before the city council.
B) Irrelevant to reasoning. City building codes are not relevant to the discussion of whether a new shopping mall will benefit the city financially.
C) Irrelevant (as we are only talking about when it is successful). This choice is a trap, because it indicates some kind of assurance that the mall will work, but that's something that should not be our focus here. Our real focus needs to be on strengthening the developer’s petition before the city council (i.e if malls are successful then these areas that are having high unemployment will benefit) Not whether the mall will be successful or not! I hope this helps as I saw a lot of confusion here on the forum
D) Correct Oh this is interesting! I will like to mark this as "the angel is in the details" in my error log!
"A developer wants to build a shopping mall in a mostly rural area of a mid-sized city." while in his argument the developer says "will ultimately benefit the city by creating jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than the national average."
In a mid-sized city there are some prosperous places (where unemployment rate is less than the national average) and some not so prosperous places (where unemployment rate is higher than the national average) what a mix!
Then the developer's arguement has assumed that they are building in the less prosperous areas which will benefit if the mall is successful! Otherwise the arguement goes for a toss!
Think about the option "The city’s largest percentage of unemployed people lives in the rural area where the proposed shopping mall would be built." This tells us we are avoiding those prosperous areas! A Clear Srengthener!
E) Irrelevant to reasoning. This answer choice, though provides a good argument, falls outside of the scope of the original statement.
Hope this helps!
22 Apr 2025, 06:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
I marked this wrong and initially thought - Isn’t D, a restatement of the premise?
D says - the largest proportion of unemployed people live where the mall is to be built.
Premise says - ....jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than national average.
But looking at the two statements above together, one can realise that D actually extends the reasoning provided in the premise by personalising the unemployment problem from the city‘s perspective and not just making a comparison to the national average. That yes, unemployment is higher than the national average, and along with that, most of the unemployed people of the city live there.
D says - the largest proportion of unemployed people live where the mall is to be built.
Premise says - ....jobs in a place where the unemployment rate is slightly higher than national average.
But looking at the two statements above together, one can realise that D actually extends the reasoning provided in the premise by personalising the unemployment problem from the city‘s perspective and not just making a comparison to the national average. That yes, unemployment is higher than the national average, and along with that, most of the unemployed people of the city live there.
20 Jun 2025, 00:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
This is my thinking :-
Imagine yourself to be a city council officer if they will ask you this question "there are 100s of places where unemployment rate is slightly higher than the national average then why u want to build only on that place the answer could be any reason supporting this question which very well D does:-)
