Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 19:02 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 19:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,882
 [28]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
 [28]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,882
 [12]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
 [12]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
peachfuzz
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Last visit: 27 Jan 2018
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
369
 [3]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 369
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mike34170
Joined: 10 Jun 2013
Last visit: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
137
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 06-26-2015
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Venture Capital)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 137
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
peachfuzz
Use the distance formula.
The line between (-1,-3) and (3,1) forms the "base" of the isosceles triangle. We just need to find the distance to the apex of the triangle. The two legs, or distances will be equal, so set them equal to each other.
d=sqrt((3-x)^2+(1-6)^2)=sqrt((-1-x)^2+(-3-6)^2)
x=-6

Answer:
(D) –6

I've handled it the same way and got the same result.

But how do we know that J and K form the base ? My guess is that if it doesn't, we could have other solutions
User avatar
peachfuzz
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Last visit: 27 Jan 2018
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 369
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mike34170
peachfuzz
Use the distance formula.
The line between (-1,-3) and (3,1) forms the "base" of the isosceles triangle. We just need to find the distance to the apex of the triangle. The two legs, or distances will be equal, so set them equal to each other.
d=sqrt((3-x)^2+(1-6)^2)=sqrt((-1-x)^2+(-3-6)^2)
x=-6

Answer:
(D) –6

I've handled it the same way and got the same result.

But how do we know that J and K form the base ? My guess is that if it doesn't, we could have other solutions

Yeah, its because the y coord is fixed at 6. Any other value for y would not result in an isosceles triangle.
avatar
sudhirgupta93
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 57
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain why we consider JK as the base and not a side that could be equal to other side?
Also, do we have to plug in all answer choices to see which is the correct one by using distance formula or do we get some quadratic equation in terms of x if we equate the two distances KL and JL?
avatar
saikrishna1987
Joined: 02 Dec 2015
Last visit: 05 Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets assume JK is not considered as base. Then, JL=JK
then, \sqrt{((3-x)^2)+25} = \sqrt{(16+16)}
this doesn't give us integral values for x which is not one of the options.
So, we can consider JL=KL.
The rest is known.
avatar
sudhirgupta93
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
18
 [2]
Given Kudos: 112
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 57
Kudos: 18
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
sudhirgupta93
Can someone please explain why we consider JK as the base and not a side that could be equal to other side?
Also, do we have to plug in all answer choices to see which is the correct one by using distance formula or do we get some quadratic equation in terms of x if we equate the two distances KL and JL?
Dear sudhirgupta93,

I'm happy to respond. :-) One important thing to appreciate about GMAT math is that there is more to understand than simply the mathematics itself--there's also the mind of the test maker. GMAT questions, especially harder ones, are designed specifically so that if one sees one particular shortcut, that unfolds very quickly to a solution. The insightful way takes less than 30 seconds. The brute force calculations, such as you are discussing, would take 10+ minutes. That's always the wrong choice on the GMAT.

The insight to this problem is the fact that any two points of the form (a, b) and (-b, -a) are reflections of each other over the line y = - x. A mirror line is a perpendicular bisector of any segment connecting a point with its image. This very naturally makes this two points the endpoints of the base of an isosceles triangle, because the vertex could be anywhere on the mirror line. See:
GMAT Math: Special Properties of the Line y = x

Without that insight, we have no idea, and we would have to spend 10-15 minutes doing a ton of algebra. That approach is a strategic disaster and will not prepare you for doing math on the GMAT. Most harder GMAT Quant questions are about having the right insight, the insight that simplifies the problem.

See the blog article:
How to do GMAT Math Faster

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Thank you Mr Mike. That was a great insight. I wish we were taught coordinate geometry like that in our school..
avatar
sumert
Joined: 30 Nov 2015
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Location: United States (CO)
WE:Information Technology (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 27
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
sudhirgupta93
Can someone please explain why we consider JK as the base and not a side that could be equal to other side?
Also, do we have to plug in all answer choices to see which is the correct one by using distance formula or do we get some quadratic equation in terms of x if we equate the two distances KL and JL?
Dear sudhirgupta93,

I'm happy to respond. :-) One important thing to appreciate about GMAT math is that there is more to understand than simply the mathematics itself--there's also the mind of the test maker. GMAT questions, especially harder ones, are designed specifically so that if one sees one particular shortcut, that unfolds very quickly to a solution. The insightful way takes less than 30 seconds. The brute force calculations, such as you are discussing, would take 10+ minutes. That's always the wrong choice on the GMAT.

The insight to this problem is the fact that any two points of the form (a, b) and (-b, -a) are reflections of each other over the line y = - x. A mirror line is a perpendicular bisector of any segment connecting a point with its image. This very naturally makes this two points the endpoints of the base of an isosceles triangle, because the vertex could be anywhere on the mirror line. See:
GMAT Math: Special Properties of the Line y = x

Without that insight, we have no idea, and we would have to spend 10-15 minutes doing a ton of algebra. That approach is a strategic disaster and will not prepare you for doing math on the GMAT. Most harder GMAT Quant questions are about having the right insight, the insight that simplifies the problem.

See the blog article:
How to do GMAT Math Faster

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

mikemcgarry i just read through the blogpost and feel like someone just gave me a key to solve these isosceles questions in coordinate geometry. What a brilliant blogpost and kudos for the easy language.
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 772
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Try to explain this without a graph (but will draw one if anyone is interested)


Given Points:
J (3 , 1)
K (-1 , -3)
L (x , 6)

1st Observation) Side JK is the NON-Equal Side

For this kind of question, rather than just using the Distance Formula and rushing to plug all the answers in, I find it easier to Visualize the Horizontal and Vertical Distance from Point to Point

Vertical Distance from J to K = (1 - (-3)) = 4 Units
Horizontal Distance from J to K = (-1 - 3) = 4 Units

Length J to K = sqrt(16 + 16)



We know that the Y Coordinate of L = 6

Vertical Distance from J to L = (6 - 1) = 5 Units
Given that the Closest X Value from a Horizontal Distance is -3 ----- Horizontal Distance MIN = 6

sqrt(25 + 36) will NOT EQUAL Side Length of JK - sqrt(16 + 16) ---- and since the Horizontal Distance will only Increase, Side JL will NEVER Equal Side JK


Vertical Distance from K to L = (-3 - 6) = 9 Units
Again, looking at all the X Values that are given as Answer Choices, there is no way to Find a Horizontal Distance from Point K's X Coordinate of -1 to any of the Values that will lead us to saying ---- Side JK can ever equal Side KL


Most of this can be done through observation, so it's not as long as it seems. I'm writing it out in case anyone is following.


Thus, the Equal Side must be: Side JL = Side KL



2nd) Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Distance between the K and L --- and J and L

since we know that these 2 Sides must now be equal, the (Horizontal Distance + Vertical Distance) must be EQUAL in order for the Pythagoras Theorem to give us Equal Length Sides

Given J (3 , 1) and the Y - Coordinate of L is 6:
Vertical Distance = 5

Given K (-1 , -3) and the Y -Coordinate of L is 6:
Vertical Distance = 9

So the X-Coordinate that we pick must Satisfy the following:

5 + (Horizontal Distance from Point J to L measured by the X-Coordinates) = 9 + (Horizontal Distance from Point K to L measured by the X-Coordinates



Starting with B = -4

5 + (+1 to -4 = 5 Units) = 9 + (-1 to -4 = 3 Units)
5 + 5 = 9 + 3

Does not work.

At this Point, I would say we would need a further X Distance along the (-)Negative X Axis such that the Point is Further Away from Point J in order to satisfy the above Equation

Trying D = -6

5 + (+1 to -6 = 7 units) = 9 + (-3 to -6 = 3 Units)

5 + 7 = 9 + 3

12 = 12

WORKS!


the X - Coordinate of L must be = -6



Just to prove this worked (now that the problem is over) we can test the Distance Formula:

L(-6 , 6) ---- to ----- J (3 , 1) = sqrt( (9^2) + (5^2) ) = sqrt(81 + 25) = sqrt(106)

L(-6, 6) --- to ---- K (-1 , -3) = sqrt( (5^2) + (9^2) ) = sqrt (25 + 81) = sqrt(106


2 Sides of the Triangle are Equal, thus making it an Isosceles Triangle.


Takeaway: sometimes visualizing these harder problems is better than trying to plug-in to formulas. A lot of what I wrote could have been down with the Graphed Paper you get during the GMAT Exam and some Visualization.

-Answer -D-
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,975
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,975
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109818 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts