Last visit was: 04 Sep 2026, 00:46 It is currently 04 Sep 2026, 00:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
osmair
Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Last visit: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
19
 [19]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 19
 [19]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,638
Own Kudos:
81,156
 [6]
Given Kudos: 489
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,638
Kudos: 81,156
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
TimeTraveller
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Last visit: 29 Jul 2017
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
369
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 237
Kudos: 369
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
applebus
Joined: 10 Nov 2014
Last visit: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 37
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FireStorm
3c + 5i = a
60c + 90i = ?

20(3c + 5i) = 60c + 100i = 20a, so the answer has to be less than 20 since we are dealing with 90i.

But, 18(3c + 5i) = 54c + 90i = 18a, here we get 54c < 60c. So answer must be 18 3/4 (B).

why not A
if you produce 18 3/4 the copper is not enough.
User avatar
mejia401
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Posts: 248
Kudos: 1,452
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO, this is a max/min problem, where the amount of alloy A is limited to how much material we have. Since we need more iron ore to make alloy A than we do from copper ore, iron ore is limiting factor, and therefore, we have enough iron ore only to make 18 tons of alloy A. Answer A.
User avatar
TimeTraveller
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Last visit: 29 Jul 2017
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 237
Kudos: 369
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
applebus
FireStorm
3c + 5i = a
60c + 90i = ?

20(3c + 5i) = 60c + 100i = 20a, so the answer has to be less than 20 since we are dealing with 90i.

But, 18(3c + 5i) = 54c + 90i = 18a, here we get 54c < 60c. So answer must be 18 3/4 (B).

why not A
if you produce 18 3/4 the copper is not enough.

Yes, none of the given options works perfectly. But the answer must be between 18 and 20, so I chose 18 3/4, although it doesn't fit all too well.
User avatar
Mascarfi
Joined: 08 May 2015
Last visit: 05 Jul 2024
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 65
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's an alloy, so you need both metals to make it. If you had 150 tons of copper ore you would not be able to make any amount of the alloy, you would just have copper ore. Therefore, the answer is A.
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,823
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Posts: 1,823
Kudos: 2,174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
Yes, you need copper ore:iron ore in the ratio 3:5. Total 8 tons of the mix in this ratio will give 1 ton of alloy A.
If you have 60 tons of copper ore, it is enough for 60/3 = 20 tons of alloy A.
If you have 90 tons of iron ore, it is enough for 90/5 = 18 tons of alloy A.

Since iron ore is available for only 18 tons of alloy A, you can make only 18 tons of alloy A.
The leftover copper ore alone cannot make any alloy A and hence will be leftover only.

Answer must be 18.

(A)

Note: This reminds me of our maximum power of 6 in 40! kind of questions. We have many 2s but fewer 3s. We can make only as many 6s as the number of 3s we have. The leftover 2s alone cannot make a 6. Makes sense?

Struggled with this for almost 15 minutes , I also tried to take the average of 18 tons of alloy and 20 tons of alloy . When no answer matched I thought I was doing something wrong .
Then I finally scrolled down and behold , I saw Karishma' s post , then a bulb lit up and every thing became clear . True to her name Karishma is indeed a magician !
User avatar
onlyPlanA
Joined: 26 Jul 2024
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 139
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I tried the allegation approach but it didn't work, and why would copper and iron be taken into 3:5 ratio?

3 5
1
4 2

This means they are in the ratio - 2:1
Hence, 2/3 * 60 = 40 and 1/3 * 90 = 30
Total = 70 tons

And 70 tons is not given in the options. But, what is wrong with this method? It is not given in the question that all of the copper and iron must be used. In fact, the method that brings us to 18 also says the same thing.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,289
Kudos: 33,897
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi onlyPlanA,

You're right that copper and iron sit in a 3:5 ratio, and you're right that not every ton of ore has to be used. But the trouble starts one step earlier: alligation is the wrong tool for this question, so the numbers it produces don't mean anything here.

Why alligation doesn't apply

Alligation answers one specific kind of question: "In what proportion should I blend two things of different strengths to hit a target average?" It needs an averaging situation - two concentrations pulling toward a mean.

This problem has no averaging at all. It hands you a fixed recipe: every single ton of alloy A eats exactly 3 tons of copper and 5 tons of iron. The 3:5 ratio isn't something you get to choose or balance - it's locked. So there's no "target" to alligate toward, and your 3 5 / 1 / 4 2 → 2:1 step is mixing quantities that were never meant to be averaged. That's why 70 falls outside the choices - the method was never valid here.

The right frame: how many full batches?

Think of it as building batches, each needing 3 copper and5 iron together:

- Copper on hand: 60 ÷ 3 = 20 batches
- Iron on hand: 90 ÷ 5 = 18 batches

Every batch needs both, so whichever runs out first caps you. Iron runs out at 18. You then use 54 tons of copper and have 6 tons of copper left over - which matches your instinct that not all the ore is used. That leftover just can't become alloy on its own.

A quick parallel to lock it in

Say each sandwich needs 2 bread slices and 1 cheese slice, and you have 10 bread and 3 cheese. How many sandwiches?

You wouldn't alligate bread against cheese - the recipe is fixed. Bread allows 5, cheese allows 3, so cheese limits you to 3 sandwiches, with 4 bread left over. Same logic, every time: fixed recipe → the scarcest ingredient sets the limit.

Answer: A

onlyPlanA
I tried the allegation approach but it didn't work, and why would copper and iron be taken into 3:5 ratio?

3 5
1
4 2

This means they are in the ratio - 2:1
Hence, 2/3 * 60 = 40 and 1/3 * 90 = 30
Total = 70 tons

And 70 tons is not given in the options. But, what is wrong with this method? It is not given in the question that all of the copper and iron must be used. In fact, the method that brings us to 18 also says the same thing.
User avatar
onlyPlanA
Joined: 26 Jul 2024
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 139
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Hi onlyPlanA,

You're right that copper and iron sit in a 3:5 ratio, and you're right that not every ton of ore has to be used. But the trouble starts one step earlier: alligation is the wrong tool for this question, so the numbers it produces don't mean anything here.

Why alligation doesn't apply

Alligation answers one specific kind of question: "In what proportion should I blend two things of different strengths to hit a target average?" It needs an averaging situation - two concentrations pulling toward a mean.

This problem has no averaging at all. It hands you a fixed recipe: every single ton of alloy A eats exactly 3 tons of copper and 5 tons of iron. The 3:5 ratio isn't something you get to choose or balance - it's locked. So there's no "target" to alligate toward, and your 3 5 / 1 / 4 2 → 2:1 step is mixing quantities that were never meant to be averaged. That's why 70 falls outside the choices - the method was never valid here.

The right frame: how many full batches?

Think of it as building batches, each needing 3 copper and5 iron together:

- Copper on hand: 60 ÷ 3 = 20 batches
- Iron on hand: 90 ÷ 5 = 18 batches

Every batch needs both, so whichever runs out first caps you. Iron runs out at 18. You then use 54 tons of copper and have 6 tons of copper left over - which matches your instinct that not all the ore is used. That leftover just can't become alloy on its own.

A quick parallel to lock it in

Say each sandwich needs 2 bread slices and 1 cheese slice, and you have 10 bread and 3 cheese. How many sandwiches?

You wouldn't alligate bread against cheese - the recipe is fixed. Bread allows 5, cheese allows 3, so cheese limits you to 3 sandwiches, with 4 bread left over. Same logic, every time: fixed recipe → the scarcest ingredient sets the limit.

Answer: A


Ah, now I get it. I didn't realize that the alloy should have 3 parts copper and 5 parts iron. Thank you for clarifying!
Moderator:
Math Expert
113112 posts