here is goes:
"The argument states that .... Formulated in this way, the argument lacks key factors, on the ground of which it could be assessed. The conclusion is based upon assumptions, for which the clear evidence is missing. Therefore, the argument is rather poor, incomplete and not convincing.
First, from the start the passage supposes that in order to ... This statement is insufficient as it does not inform on . Moreover, it is not explained why such strategy would have positive outcome in the case. Let us consider the example of Ap. To be more precise, . Therefore, it might be inappropriate for Ap. Actually, it would be better for Ap. To put it shortly, we can claim that the first argument is invalid as it does not provide any piece of background information about.... Therefore, we cannot assess wether ... The argument would have been more evident if it had been stated that .
Second, the argument claims that . This is again an unsupported allegation as it failed to show any correlation between . We can consider the example of ... In the other words, when . So we can make a conclusion that ... Nevertheless, . On the contrary, it is impossible to predict if Nespresso would have been .... if it has provided .... Therefore, success cannot be guaranted as the Nespresso's example is exactly the opposite situation. If the argument had provided some actual data or facts that.... , then it would have been much more reliable.
Finally, some extra information could have strengthened the claim. As proven before, information on ..... could have helped to understand ..., and so to decide what strategy was the best in this very situation. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of ..... would have helped us to determine whether this approach is good or not, or if another strategy is better. Having not received answers to these questions, we have the impression that the argument is a wishful thinking rather than a substantiated argument. The claim would have been strengthened if it had mentioned one of the relevant facts cited before.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. Actually, in order to assess the merits of a certain decision, it is essential to have a full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate."