Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 03:22 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 03:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Dream009
Joined: 05 Nov 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2026
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
98
 [2]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
GPA: 84
WE:General Management (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
Posts: 276
Kudos: 98
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,149
Own Kudos:
83,699
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,671
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,149
Kudos: 83,699
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JuniqueLid
Joined: 04 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Jan 2026
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 687
Posts: 51
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Puranjaysapra
Joined: 03 May 2025
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 17
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
option D can not be right. I understand it uses alternate cause theory but with alternate cause it increases the scope

- What if majority of tourist attractions were opened in the third top beach?

It also introduces reverse causality to strengthen the argument

- If several anticipated attractions were opened and Marine beach's number of tourists didn't increase, it was likely because of the epidemic.

Could you please explain these 2 points?

sayantanc2k
Official Solution:


Marine and Juhu Beach, located 5 miles apart, are the top two beaches in Country X. After an epidemic at Marine Beach in August, the number of tourists at Juhu Beach has since increased compared to the same period in previous years. It is therefore concluded that the increase in tourists at Juhu Beach is directly related to the epidemic at Marine Beach.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken this argument?


A. In spite of epidemic at Marine beach, there was little effect on tourists who visited country X.
B. The influx of tourists is normally higher in the months following August compared to the rest of the year.
C. There were several cases of drowning at Juhu Beach in the month of August this year.
D. Several highly anticipated tourist attractions have opened in the past three months at the top three beaches of Country X.
E. Although the two beaches are only 5 miles apart, there have been no reported cases of the infection in the area around Juhu Beach.


A. The argument is about the visitors in Juhu beach, not about total visitors in country X.

B. The passage states that the visitors to Juhu beach this year is higher than that last year (during the same time). That in general the no. of visitors in August is high does not explain or refute the difference between the numbers in two years.

C. The conclusion of the passage is that the increase in number of visitors is the effect of epidemic in marine beach. Number of drownings in Juhu beach does not affect this causal relation.

D. Correct. If the conclusion is that X causes Z, then weakening statement would be something else Y causes Z, since this statement gives reason to doubt the conclusion: Y, not X causes Z. Here X = Epidemic in Marine beach, Z = increase in visitors in Juhu beach, and Y = opening of other tourist attractions.

E. The reasoning is same as that in option C: this statement does not oppose the causal relation.


Answer: D
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 496
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Posts: 496
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Puranjaysapra let me try to help

Author concludes that the increase in tourists at Juhu Beach is directly related to the epidemic at Marine Beach. Why? Because after an epidemic at Marine Beach in August, the number of tourists at Juhu Beach has since increased compared to the same period in previous years.

The author assumed that the epidemic at Marine caused the decrease in the number of tourists there, and those tourists moved to Juhu Beach.

Question asks to find the weakener

Any option choice that creates a doubt on the conclusion or the gap can be our possible choice.

Option D states that the increase in tourists happened because several highly anticipated tourist attractions have opened in the past three months at the top three beaches of Country X. If these highly anticipated attractions increased the flux of tourist at the top 3 beaches, including Juhu and Marine, which are top 2 beaches, then we cant really say the epidemic at Marine led to the increase at Juhu

Now moving to your queries

1. Even if the majority opened at the third TOP beach, some also opened at the TOP 2, and that is enough to create doubt on the conclusion; a weakener doesn't have to be a very strong one.

2. The argument is nowhere stating that the tourist didn't increase at Marine; the argument is saying that at Juhu, there is an increase, so it is not strengthening

Hope this helps
Puranjaysapra
option D can not be right. I understand it uses alternate cause theory but with alternate cause it increases the scope

- What if majority of tourist attractions were opened in the third top beach?

It also introduces reverse causality to strengthen the argument

- If several anticipated attractions were opened and Marine beach's number of tourists didn't increase, it was likely because of the epidemic.

Could you please explain these 2 points?


   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
109740 posts
Founder
43149 posts