Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
28 Apr 2018, 07:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
49% (01:27) correct
51%
(01:30)
wrong
based on 333
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
To popularize the asteroid theory of dinosaur extinction, paleontologists have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than now linking the disappearance of fossil records and the layer of sediment in the Earth's crust caused by an asteroid impact.
A) have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than now linking
B) have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now and link
C) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now and link
D) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now linking
E) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than now linking
A) have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than now linking
B) have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now and link
C) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now and link
D) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than they do now linking
E) would have to provide somewhat stronger evidence than now linking
28 Apr 2018, 23:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
souvonik2k
I used the below reasoning:
Upon reading the original statement carefully, I can make out that the sentence is a suggested action that could be taken if a certain reaction is to be achieved.
Now, let's see the splits in the options:
1) have to/would have to
2) link/linking
My first elimination is on the basis of the first split. The sentence tries to bring out a suggested action that can be taken for the result. Using 'Have to' in this case is incorrect, because it conveys a necessity as opposed to a hypothetical situation which the sentence is deliberating. Hence, 'would have to' is correct.
Options A and B are eliminated
Option E is eliminated as its not parallel. "Paleontologists would have to <do something>"..than.."now".
Between options C and D:
The sentence conveys the idea that the evidence is question is fact linking "the disappearance of fossil records and the layer of sediment in the Earth's crust caused by an asteroid impact". It is not a separate task that needs to be done. Hence, 'linking' is the right usage
Option D is correct
29 Apr 2018, 03:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
Would is necessary as that thing is suggestion , something not happening or happened .
Also linking act aS modifier joining two things.
So D is correct
Posted from my mobile device
Also linking act aS modifier joining two things.
So D is correct
Posted from my mobile device
