We know Maria took seven hours, but we absolutely have no clue about Maria's average speed. On the other hand, Sarah average speed was 50 mph, which is derived from 1/3 x 60 mph + 2/3 x 45 mph = 50 mph. Yet, we still do not know how many hours Sarah was driving at 50 mph. So we have two missing values here:
Maria's average speed and Sarah's driving hours. Either one would be good to answer the question, since they were driving the same distance.
(1) is insufficient because it gives us nothing about Maria's average speed or Sarah's driving hours.
(2) Okay, so we have two scenarios: Maria's speed is 10 mph faster than Sarah's or Maria's speed is 10 mph slower than Sarah's.
In the first scenario, assuming that Maria's speed is 60 mph (50 mph + 10 mph), we arrive at the total distance of 60 mph x 7 hours = 420 miles covered by Maria. Because they drove the same distance, it implies that the total distance they covered would be 840 miles.
In the second scenario, Maria's speed was 40 mph (50 mph - 10 mph). Therefore, the total distance covered by Maria was 40 mph x 7 hours = 280 miles. The total distance they covered would be 560 miles.
Therefore, the statement (2) is insufficient.
(3) However, combining both statements, we now know that Sarah took less time than Maria (Sarah is faster than Maria), thus Maria is slower than Sarah by 10 mph, which takes us to the second scenario of 40 mph (Maria's speed). As a result, the total distance they covered would be 560 miles.
The answer is C.
Thank you!