Premime -
When school administrators translate educational research into a standardized teaching program and mandate its use by teachers, students learn less and learn less well than they did before, even though the teachers are the same. Conclusion - T
he translation by the administrators of theory into prescribed practice must, therefore, be flawed.
The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Teachers differ in their ability to teach in accordance with wi th standardized programs.
INCORRECT. Nothing about the difference in the teacher's ability is stated in either the premise or the conclusion. (B) The educational research on which the standardized teaching programs are based is sound.
CORRECT. IF we negate this then the conclusion falls apart, if the educational research is not sound then it is not the fault of the administrators, hence if the transalation is the issue then the educational research must be sound. (C) Researchers should be the ones to translate their own research into teaching programs.
INCORRECT. The translation by administrators is flawed, this does not mean that the researchers should translate it themselves, they could be translated by a teacher or a third party for all we know. (D) The ways in which teachers choose to implement the programs are ineffective.
INCORRECT. The conclusion points that the flaw is of the admnistrators the teachers are no where brought into the conclusion. (E) The level of student learning will vary from state to state.
INCORRECT. Nothing in the premise or conclusion states this.