KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONIn a Strengthen EXCEPT question, the right answer
doesn’t have to be a weakener—it could also have no
effect on the argument.According to the consumer advocate, we shouldn’t
trust the claims businesses make in their ads because
their primary motivation, turning a profit, isn’t an
incentive to tell the truth. Four of our choices will
provide additional evidence in support of that claim,
and one will not. That doesn’t mean the odd man out
has to weaken—it just can’t strengthen.
(A) strengthens the argument by indicating that
inaccurate ads will be rewarded with profits. If that’s
true, then businesses can be counted upon to lie, and
we ought to be skeptical.
(B) If inaccuracies occur often, then the consumer
advocate’s recommendation of skepticism becomes a
little more compelling. It offers empirical support for
the advocate’s claim. This is a strengthener.
(C), however, has no effect on the advocate’s
recommendation because that recommendation
doesn’t depend on consumers’ current attitudes
toward ads. (C) is the exception and therefore the
correct answer.
(D) suggests that the accuracy of ads is not a priority
for businesses, which indicates that the truth of those
ads should be questioned.
(E) removes one primary deterrent to inaccurate
advertising. If most inaccurate advertising isn’t
regulated by current law, businesses have no reason to
present accurate information, and consumers
therefore have a reason to be skeptical.