Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:40 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 802
Own Kudos:
2,600
 [20]
Given Kudos: 202
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 802
Kudos: 2,600
 [20]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Doer01
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
166
 [1]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Posts: 215
Kudos: 166
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chrisbender
Joined: 02 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 41
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Doer01
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
166
 [3]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Posts: 215
Kudos: 166
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chrisbender
Doer01
Hi,
Application says that Healy's is guilty of misrepresentation. Principle says that one is only guilty of misrepresentation if such a description is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders.
So Healy's would be only guilty if its action was deliberate and was to mislead bidders. This is what option E states.
(E) Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy’s described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order to increase its auction price.

IMO E.

Question, by not consulting an expert, doesn't leave open the possibility that the description was in fact a mistake, and not deliberate. They did not have anyone on staff who was an expert, so they may have incorrectly assumed that vase was from the 18th century. Option A, while not stating explicitly that it was deliberate, certainly explains why they would deliberately do so.

Hi chrisbender ,
I could be wrong mate.
My understanding:
If deliberate attempt to mislead bidders---->guilty of misrepresentation
Application: Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation. Why? Because its catalog described a vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century when it was actually a modern reproduction.
Now, what information would justify the conclusion drawn in application-Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation.

Missing piece: was it a deliberate action?

Lets look at option A & E.
(A) An authentic work of art from the mid-eighteenth century will usually sell for at least ten times more than a modern reproduction of a similar work from that period.
A general principle but it does not say that Healy's action was deliberate.

(E) Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy’s described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order to increase its auction price.
So Healy's aim was to increase auction price, a deliberate action.
User avatar
chrisbender
Joined: 02 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 41
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doer01
chrisbender
Doer01
Hi,
Application says that Healy's is guilty of misrepresentation. Principle says that one is only guilty of misrepresentation if such a description is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders.
So Healy's would be only guilty if its action was deliberate and was to mislead bidders. This is what option E states.
(E) Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy’s described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order to increase its auction price.

IMO E.

Question, by not consulting an expert, doesn't leave open the possibility that the description was in fact a mistake, and not deliberate. They did not have anyone on staff who was an expert, so they may have incorrectly assumed that vase was from the 18th century. Option A, while not stating explicitly that it was deliberate, certainly explains why they would deliberately do so.

Hi chrisbender ,

I could be wrong mate.
My understanding:
If deliberate attempt to mislead bidders---->guilty of misrepresentation
Application: Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation. Why? Because its catalog described a vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century when it was actually a modern reproduction.
Now, what information would justify the conclusion drawn in application-Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation.

Missing piece: was it a deliberate action?

Lets look at option A & E.
(A) An authentic work of art from the mid-eighteenth century will usually sell for at least ten times more than a modern reproduction of a similar work from that period.
A general principle but it does not say that Healy's action was deliberate.

(E) Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy’s described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order to increase its auction price.
So Healy's aim was to increase auction price, a deliberate action.

To be honest I didn't pay enough attention to the highlighted part, it does a better job of stating intent.
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 326
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 326
Kudos: 217
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hovkial
Principle: Even if an art auction house identifies the descriptions in its catalog as opinions, it is guilty of misrepresentation if such a description is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders.
Application: Although Healy’s, an art auction house, states that all descriptions in its catalog are opinions, Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation when its catalog described a vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century when it was actually a modern reproduction.

Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?

carouselambra, nightblade354,
Although, this is a great question and taught me something (I got it wrong), I wonder if this type of question appears in GMAT.

nightblade354,
I had came across in couple of questions with your posts mentioning 'This is a JUSTIFY question and not relevant to GMAT'.
My request to you is: Can we - you - please take these questions off? OR at least add a new tag
JUSTIFY, instead of STRENGTHEN..?

Just a request...
Thanks.
User avatar
carouselambra
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Mar 2018
Last visit: 28 Apr 2023
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 297
Kudos: 451
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheGraceful
Hovkial
Principle: Even if an art auction house identifies the descriptions in its catalog as opinions, it is guilty of misrepresentation if such a description is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders.
Application: Although Healy’s, an art auction house, states that all descriptions in its catalog are opinions, Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation when its catalog described a vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century when it was actually a modern reproduction.

Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?

carouselambra, nightblade354,
Although, this is a great question and taught me something (I got it wrong), I wonder if this type of question appears in GMAT.

nightblade354,
I had came across in couple of questions with your posts mentioning 'This is a JUSTIFY question and not relevant to GMAT'.
My request to you is: Can we - you - please take these questions off? OR at least add a new tag
JUSTIFY, instead of STRENGTHEN..?

Just a request...
Thanks.

Although such questions might not be so frequent, this will help you in analyzing the argument thoroughly.
Might serve as a good foundation for typical GMAT solve the paradox/Strengthen/Assumption questions.

Cheers!
User avatar
vv65
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 536
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 778
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 536
Kudos: 405
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Such a question is rare in GMAT CR, but something like this COULD appear. I think a question of this type is more likely in RC rather than in CR.

If you're at a high level already and aiming for a top score, it's worth doing the question and learning from it.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 326
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 326
Kudos: 217
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carouselambra
Although such questions might not be so frequent, this will help you in analyzing the argument thoroughly.
Might serve as a good foundation for typical GMAT solve the paradox/Strengthen/Assumption questions.

Cheers!

Makes sense.
I got this wrong and taught/reminded me the most critical skill on GMAT - thorough reading.
Thanks.
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 326
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 326
Kudos: 217
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vv65
Such a question is rare in GMAT CR, but something like this COULD appear. I think a question of this type is more likely in RC rather than in CR.

If you're at a high level already and aiming for a top score, it's worth doing the question and learning from it.

Posted from my mobile device


Thank you for the suggestion.

Your GMAT Verbal score looks impressive (I mean both quant and verbal are good but verbal must be having percentile).
Can you please share, your verbal preparation (materials used and study approach for verbal).

Thanks in advance.
User avatar
vv65
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 536
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 778
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 536
Kudos: 405
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TheGraceful

Can you please share, your verbal preparation (materials used and study approach for verbal).

Thanks in advance.
I took the exam at as a GMAT verbal teacher, to get a taste of the exam (That verbal score was a disappointment!) Anyway, I didn't prepare for Verbal other than taking mock tests.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Principle: Even if an art auction house identifies the descriptions in its catalog as opinions, it is guilty of misrepresentation if such a description is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders.

Application: Although Healy’s, an art auction house, states that all descriptions in its catalog are opinions, Healy’s was guilty of misrepresentation when its catalog described a vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century when it was actually a modern reproduction.

Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?

(A) An authentic work of art from the mid-eighteenth century will usually sell for at least ten times more than a modern reproduction of a similar work from that period. - WRONG. A generic statement(just like in C) that needs more assumption to be made for the specific act done in application.

(B) Although pottery that is similar to the vase is currently extremely popular among art collectors, none of the collectors who are knowledgeable about such pottery were willing to bid on the vase. - WRONG. Not related to the core of the passage i.e. deliberation act from Healy's or not.

(C) The stated policy of Healy’s is to describe works in its catalogs only in terms of their readily perceptible qualities and not to include any information about their age. - WRONG. Yes, looks good but was there any deliberation from Healy's that can be proved based on this choice. No!!

(D) Some Healy’s staff members believe that the auction house’s catalog should not contain any descriptions that have not been certified to be true by independent experts. - WRONG. What "some" believe doesn't justify the statement that Healy's was indeed misrepresenting. Additional layer of assumption is required for this to make a good candidate.

(E) Without consulting anyone with expertise in authenticating vases, Healy’s described the vase as dating from the mid-eighteenth century merely in order to increase its auction price. - CORRECT. Only A and E are contenders but E wins to give us specifics for deliberation to be proved.

Answer E.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts