Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 05:17 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 05:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
772
 [23]
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 294
Kudos: 772
 [23]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
tbhauer
Joined: 24 Sep 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
75
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 136
Kudos: 75
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
avinashiitp
Joined: 11 Dec 2019
Last visit: 01 Mar 2023
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
73
 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35 (Online)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35 (Online)
Posts: 97
Kudos: 73
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tarun001
Joined: 26 Jul 2020
Last visit: 23 Apr 2023
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.62
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V34
Posts: 30
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D doesn't seem parallel to me as it says that the essay furnished no (original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Original thought (noun) is not parallel to discussed (verb). E seems parallel to me as it says that the essay (did not furnish any original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Both are clauses so parallel. AndrewN can you please share your valuable insights on my analysis.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,660
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,660
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarun001
D doesn't seem parallel to me as it says that the essay furnished no (original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Original thought (noun) is not parallel to discussed (verb). E seems parallel to me as it says that the essay (did not furnish any original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Both are clauses so parallel. AndrewN can you please share your valuable insights on my analysis.
I am going to take a hands-off approach to this one, tarun001, because I know how difficult it can be to write a logically sound SC question. I would not write the sentence in any of the ways we see above. As always, I would advise you to stick with official material—you know you can trust the questions.

I know this may not be the answer you were seeking, but thank you, nevertheless, for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarun001
D doesn't seem parallel to me as it says that the essay furnished no (original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Original thought (noun) is not parallel to discussed (verb). E seems parallel to me as it says that the essay (did not furnish any original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Both are clauses so parallel. AndrewN can you please share your valuable insights on my analysis.

Hello tarun001,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, your observation would be correct had Option D used the idiomatic construction "neither A nor B"; “neither A nor B” is an idiomatic construction wherein A and B must be parallel; this rule does not hold for the construction "no A nor B".

In Option D, the parallelism marker is the conjunction "nor", and it joins the parallel verb phrases "furnished no original thought" and "discussed a practical solution".

To understand the concept of "Either-Or" and "Neither-Nor" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):


All the best!
Experts' Global Team
avatar
SanJain
Joined: 23 Apr 2020
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 42
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here, a nor cant come without neither. Only one option has neither in it. Therefore, answer should be A
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
6,161
 [1]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,161
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SanJain
Here, a nor cant come without neither. Only one option has neither in it. Therefore, answer should be A

Hello SanJain,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, “neither” cannot be used without “nor”, but “nor” can be used without “neither”.

Further, Option A utilizes a double negative in the phrase "did not furnish neither", producing an incoherent meaning. Option A also fails to maintain parallelism between A ("original thought") and B ("discussed a practical solution") in the idiomatic construction "neither A nor B"; remember, “neither A nor B” and “either A or B” are idiomatic uses and are only used when referring to two elements; A and B must be parallel.

By contrast, Option D avoids the double negative error and maintains parallelism between "furnished no original thought" and "discussed a practical solution" - the elements linked by the conjunction ("nor" in this case).

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
NawalDwivedi
Joined: 04 Jan 2019
Last visit: 04 Apr 2023
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Status:Design Engineer
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 48
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
tarun001
D doesn't seem parallel to me as it says that the essay furnished no (original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Original thought (noun) is not parallel to discussed (verb). E seems parallel to me as it says that the essay (did not furnish any original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Both are clauses so parallel. AndrewN can you please share your valuable insights on my analysis.

Hello tarun001,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, your observation would be correct had Option D used the idiomatic construction "neither A nor B"; “neither A nor B” is an idiomatic construction wherein A and B must be parallel; this rule does not hold for the construction "no A nor B".

In Option D, the parallelism marker is the conjunction "nor", and it joins the parallel verb phrases "furnished no original thought" and "discussed a practical solution".

To understand the concept of "Either-Or" and "Neither-Nor" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):


All the best!
Experts' Global Team


While the explanation seems correct for the answer option D, why is answer option E incorrect ?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NawalDwivedi
ExpertsGlobal5
tarun001
D doesn't seem parallel to me as it says that the essay furnished no (original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Original thought (noun) is not parallel to discussed (verb). E seems parallel to me as it says that the essay (did not furnish any original thought) nor (discussed a solution). Both are clauses so parallel. AndrewN can you please share your valuable insights on my analysis.

Hello tarun001,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, your observation would be correct had Option D used the idiomatic construction "neither A nor B"; “neither A nor B” is an idiomatic construction wherein A and B must be parallel; this rule does not hold for the construction "no A nor B".

In Option D, the parallelism marker is the conjunction "nor", and it joins the parallel verb phrases "furnished no original thought" and "discussed a practical solution".

To understand the concept of "Either-Or" and "Neither-Nor" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):


All the best!
Experts' Global Team


While the explanation seems correct for the answer option D, why is answer option E incorrect ?

Hello NawalDwivedi,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, Option E fails to maintain parallelism between "it did not furnish any original thought" and "discussed a practical solution"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("nor" in this case) must be parallel.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,401
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,401
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts