Hey, I had a similar doubt as explained before but slightly more nuanced.
While yes the guidelines say that the line is straight which is mentioned to be the case for AB. The same guideline could be interpreted as OA and OB are the straight lines used. And the difference angle AOB is not 180 but rather 179.5+ which would still follow the guidelines and not be a diameter.
Furthermore, the diagram mentions a square with the vertices ACDE.
It does not mention :
- ABC is a triangle, thereby eliminating a quadrilateral of AOBC.
- Point is either on the circumference or inside or outside the circle, explicitly.
- Inscribed triangles
- OC is a radius.
Any of these would clearly imply that line AB is straight and as a result, ABC is an inscribed triangle and such.
BUT, the inclusion of the second statement, categorically proves ABC is an inscribed triangle - AB is diameter - points are on the line.
Thus making both statements sufficient - Ans choice C.
I do understand that once AB is assumed to be a single line the entire explanation adds up - no doubts.
But given the lack of any of these points mentioned above being a part of the data, how are we to assume so?
Alternatively, if we are to assume so, would we be right to assume that any figure drawn with a triangle that is implied to be inscribed within a semi-circle can in fact ONLY be a triangle, and in no case can it be a quadrilateral?