OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
For SC butler Questions Click Here THE PROMPTQuote:
Once there was the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
• Meaning?
After two events occurred, "Palestine" became the official name of a distinct territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.I might also write, "
Because two events occurred, 'Palestine' became . . . "
Although sequence and causality are important, no strong causal word exists in the sentence.
This absence creates a fairly sophisticated sentence.
The writer wants to emphasize the historic moment rather than what made that moment possible.
The correct answer helps the writer to do so.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A)
Once there was the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
• the singular verb
was does not agree with the compound subject
the British conquest and
the establishment of a mandated territory• even if this option used
were, the sentence would not make a lot of sense:
→
Once there were the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
-- the sentence would be clearer without the
there was (expletive) construction
-- the sentence would be clearer if the nouns were paired with a stronger verb than
was or
wereDo not try to rewrite sentences. I note these details only to give you a sense of what else is wrong with this option.
• usage of
once?
-- in this sentence it means
after or
as soon as. (Jargon: in this case,
once is a conjunction, not an adverb._
-- Such usage in and of itself is fine. In fact,
once is often used to herald (announce, spotlight) an event.
Correct:
Once the intelligence was declassified, Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections became clear. -- But the use of
once in this sentence does not work.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B)
That there was the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
• the part before the comma lacks a verb
That there was means
the fact that there was; the noun clause beginning with
that has no verb
• the sentence is at best a run-on
-- the first part lacks a verb and the two parts are "stuck together" with nothing more than a comma
-- the second part is a full sentence that could stand alone but is ruined by the first part of the sentence
• same problem as that in (A): singular
was does not agree with plural
conquest and
establishment •
that + there was is a stylistic disaster
-- now we have
two departures from a standard Subject-Verb-Object sentence, and they do not play well together
-- beyond grammar errors, the first part of the sentence is clumsy and wordy
-- I have never seen a question in which GMAC coupled what it calls a "nominalized clause" (a noun clause) with a
there was/there were (expletive) construction—nor do I expect to see such a question
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C)
The accomplishment of the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
• the subjects in the first part of the sentence lack a verb:
accomplishment and
establishment are not attached to any verb
• a fragment and a run-on
→ we have a sentence that lacks a verb "stuck" to an independent clause with nothing more than a comma, and the result is an ungrammatical mess.
→ the first part of the sentence needs to be connected to the second one in a proper way.
•
accomplishment and
conquest are not redundant, but they are repetitive.
→ The usage of the two words together is not standard. We do not need
accomplishmentELIMINATE C
Quote:
D)
At the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
•
at refers to location. If paired with a date, hour, or other timestamp (not the case here),
at can refer to the time that an event occurs.
Correct:
He eats dinner at 8 p.m.Correct:
At sundown, the valley is awash in muted light.• If we want to use
at in this way, however, we need something like this sentence:
At the time of the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory, Palestine became . . . → In this case, oddly enough, using "the time of" plus an event plus a date is not redundant.
-- this
at means location. Wrong.
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E)
With the British conquest in 1917 and the subsequent establishment of a mandated territory in the conquered areas, Palestine became the official name of a definite territory for the first time since the Middle Ages.
• although this option sounds strange, I recognize its idiomatic usage. I see no error
•
with can be used to indicate a close association in time.
With the arrival and spread of COVID 19 in their countries, smart leaders began to wear masks.•
with announces the events (conquest, establishment of territory) that set into motion the immediately following event ("Palestine" became the name of an actual place for the first time in a long time)
Correct:
With the Germans' defeat at Stalingrad, the tide of World War II in Europe turned.The answer is ECommentsThese answers range from good to very good.
People seem to have the right "sense" of which answer works best—and with prepositions such as
with, very often mere exposure to the language helps develop that sense.
tyildirim92 , I know that you are not a native Spanish speaker, but I did not know you are Turkish. You are indeed entertaining.
And along with learning should come levity . . . and kudos, both ways.
Nice work, everyone.