Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 2110:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
30 Nov 2020, 09:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dropdown 1: less than 40%
Dropdown 2: did not gain
The figure shows changes in state district size and changes in the number of House seats allocated to each state between the 1990 and 2010 apportionments. Twelve U.S. House seats shifted across states following the 2010 census; 10 states lost seats and 8 states gained seats, distributed as shown.
A. If an individual were to select a state from the map at random, the likelihood that the state would have experienced a change in its number of House seats following the 2010 census would be .
B. From the information above, if a state experienced an increase in average district population of more than 200,000 people from 1990-2010, it could be determined that the state House seats over that time period.
A. If an individual were to select a state from the map at random, the likelihood that the state would have experienced a change in its number of House seats following the 2010 census would be .
B. From the information above, if a state experienced an increase in average district population of more than 200,000 people from 1990-2010, it could be determined that the state House seats over that time period.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Dropdown 1: less than 40%
Dropdown 2: did not gain
30 Nov 2020, 09:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Correct answer:
Dropdown 1: less than 40%
Dropdown 2: did not gain
TetyanaRokobit
The figure addresses the changes from 1990-2010, so note the text which states that following the 2010 census 10 states lost seats and 8 states gained seats. 18 of 50 states is equal to 36%.
Correct answer:
Dropdown 1: less than 40%
Dropdown 2: did not gain
YogeshBardia
Joined: 24 Jun 2023
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 21
Given Kudos: 18
Schools: LBS MiM "26
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
19 Feb 2024, 08:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
According to the given diagram when we count the states who have experienced a change in no. of seats, we get that 26 states have experienced change, and by that we get that 26/50> 50% but according to the statement, we get that we only have 18 states who experienced a change in 2010, Now which should be considered, I am conused please help me.
