Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 23:51 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 23:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
JohnGalt1
Joined: 10 Feb 2021
Last visit: 13 Apr 2022
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
78
 [20]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Fiji
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V26
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.44
WE:Account Management (Consulting)
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
Posts: 40
Kudos: 78
 [20]
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AkashM
Joined: 28 Jul 2019
Last visit: 03 Jun 2021
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
58
 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 99
Kudos: 58
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AkhilAggarwal
Joined: 08 Sep 2020
Last visit: 13 Sep 2022
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Posts: 35
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,378
 [3]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,378
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnGalt1
An investment account may hold money in a variety of forms, including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves. Recent allegations, of insider trading within the pharmaceutical industry have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off as those holding stock in non-related industries react negatively to the news. Evidence suggests, however, that there has been no such sell-of, because financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of investment accounts since the allegations were made public.
The argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

A) People who held stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals purchased low-priced pharmaceutical stock at unusually highly rates in response to the news.
B) Those who sold their pharmaceuticals stocks and purchased new stocks tended to choose cheaper stocks and buy fewer shares
C) Those holding non-pharmaceutical stocks are skeptical about the possibility of those stocks' values increasing in the near future.
D) Data has not yet been released as to the total volume of trading since the allegations were made public.
E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.

An account may hold money in a variety of forms - stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves.

Some allegations have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off of stocks.

Financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of accounts.

Conclusion: There has been no such sell-off

So an account holds stocks and other financial products. Some uninvested cash is also there (cash that people keep so that they can quickly invest if some opportunity comes in. If people sell off then they get cash which is added to the cash reserve. They can invest again using this cash.)

There was a rumour of market-wide stock sell off. But cash reserves have not increased. Hence the argument is concluding that there has been no sell-off.
That is not necessary. What if people did sell off the stocks but invested in bonds instead which are safer? Then there may have been a sell off and still the cash reserve would not have shown any substantial increase.

So which is an assumption to conclude that sell off did not happen?

E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.

We are assuming that people are not transferring their money into bonds to say that sell off did not happen. Hence, this is a valid assumption.

AkhilAggarwal - Hope this is clear. Also note that even if there were a decrease in the cash reserve, that does not invalidate the premise that "there was no increase". It stays true that there was no increase.
User avatar
AkhilAggarwal
Joined: 08 Sep 2020
Last visit: 13 Sep 2022
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Posts: 35
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
JohnGalt1
An investment account may hold money in a variety of forms, including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves. Recent allegations, of insider trading within the pharmaceutical industry have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off as those holding stock in non-related industries react negatively to the news. Evidence suggests, however, that there has been no such sell-of, because financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of investment accounts since the allegations were made public.
The argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

A) People who held stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals purchased low-priced pharmaceutical stock at unusually highly rates in response to the news.
B) Those who sold their pharmaceuticals stocks and purchased new stocks tended to choose cheaper stocks and buy fewer shares
C) Those holding non-pharmaceutical stocks are skeptical about the possibility of those stocks' values increasing in the near future.
D) Data has not yet been released as to the total volume of trading since the allegations were made public.
E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.

An account may hold money in a variety of forms - stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves.

Some allegations have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off of stocks.

Financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of accounts.

Conclusion: There has been no such sell-off

So an account holds stocks and other financial products. Some uninvested cash is also there (cash that people keep so that they can quickly invest if some opportunity comes in. If people sell off then they get cash which is added to the cash reserve. They can invest again using this cash.)

There was a rumour of market-wide stock sell off. But cash reserves have not increased. Hence the argument is concluding that there has been no sell-off.
That is not necessary. What if people did sell off the stocks but invested in bonds instead which are safer? Then there may have been a sell off and still the cash reserve would not have shown any substantial increase.

So which is an assumption to conclude that sell off did not happen?

E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.

We are assuming that people are not transferring their money into bonds to say that sell off did not happen. Hence, this is a valid assumption.

AkhilAggarwal - Hope this is clear. Also note that even if there were a decrease in the cash reserve, that does not invalidate the premise that "there was no increase". It stays true that there was no increase.

VeritasKarishma
Thank you for the reply
User avatar
sherlocked221B
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
74
 [2]
Given Kudos: 344
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GPA: 8.45
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
Posts: 90
Kudos: 74
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB

JohnGalt1
An investment account may hold money in a variety of forms, including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves. Recent allegations, of insider trading within the pharmaceutical industry have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off as those holding stock in non-related industries react negatively to the news. Evidence suggests, however, that there has been no such sell-of, because financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of investment accounts since the allegations were made public.
The argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

A) People who held stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals purchased low-priced pharmaceutical stock at unusually highly rates in response to the news.
B) Those who sold their pharmaceuticals stocks and purchased new stocks tended to choose cheaper stocks and buy fewer shares
C) Those holding non-pharmaceutical stocks are skeptical about the possibility of those stocks' values increasing in the near future.
D) Data has not yet been released as to the total volume of trading since the allegations were made public.
E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.
An account may hold money in a variety of forms - stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or currently uninvested cash reserves.

Some allegations have prompted rumors of a market-wide sell-off of stocks.

Financial records reveal no unusual increase in the total uninvested cash reserves of accounts.

Conclusion: There has been no such sell-off

So an account holds stocks and other financial products. Some uninvested cash is also there (cash that people keep so that they can quickly invest if some opportunity comes in. If people sell off then they get cash which is added to the cash reserve. They can invest again using this cash.)

There was a rumour of market-wide stock sell off. But cash reserves have not increased. Hence the argument is concluding that there has been no sell-off.
That is not necessary. What if people did sell off the stocks but invested in bonds instead which are safer? Then there may have been a sell off and still the cash reserve would not have shown any substantial increase.

So which is an assumption to conclude that sell off did not happen?

E) People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals are not transferring their money into less risky investments such as bonds and mutual funds.

We are assuming that people are not transferring their money into bonds to say that sell off did not happen. Hence, this is a valid assumption.

AkhilAggarwal - Hope this is clear. Also note that even if there were a decrease in the cash reserve, that does not invalidate the premise that "there was no increase". It stays true that there was no increase.
 
­KarishmaB In choosing Option E - how does it matter "People who hold stock in industries unrelated to pharmaceuticals"? Is this unrelated information or does it have to do anything with the reasoning why only people holding stock in industried unrelated to pharma are selling off?

Experts - [b]sayan640 Bunuel b_sudharsan GMATNinja, any help here?[/b]
 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
496 posts
358 posts