Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 18:05 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 18:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Simplyklik
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 28 Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
47
 [42]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 47
 [42]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
37
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,002
 [4]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,002
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sriharsha4444
Joined: 06 Jun 2018
Last visit: 05 Mar 2026
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 803
Posts: 125
Kudos: 84
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bismuth83
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Sep 2024
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 714
Own Kudos:
3,135
 [1]
Given Kudos: 441
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 714
Kudos: 3,135
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sriharsha4444
GMATNinja ChiranjeevSingh KarishmaB
why can't the answer be `colonies of ants, but not individual ants` and `a high-quality nest site` since per the experiment, colonies of ants are doing equally well when the number of options grow but not the case with individual ants. I do agree the original answer also makes sense but not sure how to reject this one

"Colonies, on the other hand, chose equally well with either two or eight options"

Your option: "when the researchers increased the number of site choices,
colonies of ants, but not individual ants were more likely to choose a high-quality nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices".

As you can see "more likely" in your option is incorrect because in the text it's stated "equally well". In other words, the probability of choosing a high-quality nest by the colony is the same for both experiments (2 & 8) and that is why you can't use "more likely" in your option.

User avatar
Amity007
Joined: 12 Sep 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 999
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Products:
Schools: ISB
Posts: 202
Kudos: 352
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I found a better explanation for the correct answer.
We have to consider 2 experiments situation,
1- when ants given increased number of sited to choose from
2- when ants given fewer/lesser number of sites to choose from

Now, if we consider “colonies of ants” choosing “higher probability of high quality nest”
It would be somewhat same or equal chance/probability for both cases. It creates a doubt. When we compare high number of choices to fewer number of choices.

And if we consider “individual ants” and choosing “unsuitable nest” then we can see that we are very sure that if we have given greater number of nest choices to individuals they will end up choosing unsuitable as compared to lesser number of nest.

So I feel comparing 2 situations can be very helpful to come to the conclusion for answers.

Simplyklik
Researchers designed an experiment to test whether colonies of ants could choose a high-quality nest site from many options more effectively than could individual ants. Colonies and individual ants were both given two levels of tasks: choosing between two nest sites, or choosing from among eight nest sites. In both tasks, half the sites were unsuitable. Researchers discovered that individual ants made much worse decisions when faced with eight options than when faced with two, suggesting that they experienced a cognitive overload. Colonies, on the other hand, chose equally well with either two or eight options, showing that they could better solve the more complex problem as a collective.

According to the experimental results, when the researchers increased the number of site choices, ___X___ were more likely to choose ___Y___than when the researchers presented fewer site choices.

Select for X and for Y the options that jointly complete the sentence in a manner consistent with the information provided. Make only two selections, one in each column.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi sriharsha4444,

Great question — this is a really common trap on TPA verbal questions, and the distinction is subtle but critical.

Let's plug your proposed combination into the sentence:

"When the researchers increased the number of site choices, colonies of ants, but not individual ants were MORE LIKELY to choose a high-quality nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."

Now look at what the passage actually says about colonies: they "chose equally well with either two or eight options."

Equally well. Not better. Not worse. The same.

Your combination claims colonies were MORE LIKELY to pick a good site with 8 options than with 2. But the experiment showed no improvement — colonies performed the same regardless of the number of choices. "Equally well" does not equal "more likely." So your pairing overstates what colonies did.

Now look at the correct pair:

"When the researchers increased the number of site choices, individual ants, but not colonies of ants were more likely to choose an unsuitable nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."

For X = individual ants, but not colonies: Individual ants made "much worse decisions" with 8 options (cognitive overload). Colonies did equally well. So only individual ants changed behavior — this fits.

For Y = an unsuitable nest site: Worse decisions means picking bad sites more often. With more options, individual ants were indeed more likely to land on an unsuitable site. This is directly supported.

Key Insight: The sentence says "more likely," which requires a CHANGE in behavior when options increased. Individual ants changed (got worse). Colonies did NOT change. So only individual ants can fill the X slot, and the direction of their change (worse decisions) matches "an unsuitable nest site" for Y.

Answer: 4A, 2B
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts