Hi sriharsha4444,Great question — this is a really common
trap on TPA verbal questions, and the distinction is subtle but critical.
Let's plug your proposed combination into the sentence:"When the researchers increased the number of site choices, colonies of ants, but not individual ants were MORE LIKELY to choose a high-quality nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."
Now look at what the passage actually says about colonies: they "chose equally well with either
two or
eight options."
Equally well. Not better. Not worse. The same.
Your combination claims colonies were MORE LIKELY to pick a good site with
8 options than with
2. But the experiment showed no improvement — colonies performed the same regardless of the number of choices.
"Equally well" does not equal "more likely." So your pairing overstates what colonies did.
Now look at the correct pair:"When the researchers increased the number of site choices, individual ants, but not colonies of ants were more likely to choose an unsuitable nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."
For X = individual ants, but not colonies: Individual ants made "much worse decisions" with
8 options (cognitive overload). Colonies did equally well. So only individual ants changed behavior — this fits.
For Y = an unsuitable nest site: Worse decisions means picking bad sites more often. With more options, individual ants were indeed more likely to land on an unsuitable site. This is directly supported.
Key Insight: The sentence says "more likely," which requires a CHANGE in behavior when options increased. Individual ants changed (got worse). Colonies did
NOT change. So only individual ants can fill the X slot, and the direction of their change (worse decisions) matches "an unsuitable nest site" for Y.
Answer: 4A, 2B