OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
During the early years of the American Civil War, when the Union Army provided one assistant surgeon to every regiment of a thousand men,
women nurses, familiar with various surgical procedures, were a help in treating many injured soldiers.
•
modifiersWhen a modifying phrase is
not at the beginning of a sentence but rather is placed
between two nouns to which or to whom the modifier could logically refer, which noun "takes" the modifier?
Answer: The first subject.
Simple adjectives almost always
precede a noun:
→
A skilled surgeon. A knowledgeable tutor.Adjective phrases and clauses that are not introductory statements
follow a noun.
→ . . .
she is a famous surgeon, skilled in techniques very few people can perform.Here is a funny example in which the modifier should immediately follow its noun:
→ Wrong:
The lifeguard dove into the surf with the deep tan. (The surf did not have a deep tan.)
→ Corrected, adjective phrase in between two nouns modifies the first noun:
The lifeguard with the deep tan dove into the surf.• idiom: help
→ The word
help is versatile (see
this collocations page, here), but GMAC occasionally tests the unidiomatic construction
help in doing (or
help in verbING)
• pronoun, THIS
→
this usually "points" to a noun: Please sit in
this comfortable red chair near the fireplace rather than on
that hard bench near the window.
→
this is almost never a standalone pronoun (but see immediately below)
→ can almost never refer to a noun or a preceding clause or phrase (but see immediately below)
→ There is one recent official exception that showed up in OG 2020 and remains in OG 2021 and 0G 2022.
In that question, this is a standalone pronoun that refers to an entire preceding phrase.
SPOILER ALERTThat question is
here.
→ Verdict?
If you have two seemingly correct options and one of them uses
this as a standalone pronoun, eliminate that option and choose the other one.
Quote:
A) women nurses, familiar with various surgical procedures,
were a help in treating• idiom error
→
help in treating is a noun phrase that is colloquial and too informal at best or not idiomatic at worst.
This construction might be acceptable in informal writing but is unlikely to be correct on the GMAT.
• style issue (after comparing with option C)
→
harshpathak96 's question made me notice that, as a matter of style, the non-action verb
were paired with the previous verb
provided is not as strong as verb pairing in option C.
This option creates a hard situation. The answer is not horrible, but it is not great, either.
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
B) women nurses were familiar with various surgical procedures and
this helped them to treat
→
this as a standalone pronoun is highly suspect
→ if allowed as a standalone pronoun, this is ambiguous.
Does
this refer to the nurses' familiarity with the surgical procedures or the variety of surgical procedures?
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) women nurses, familiar with various surgical procedures, helped to treat
• I do not see any errors
• correct idiom
→ The idiom
helped to treat is in the correct form (help + infinitive).
• correctly placed modifiers
→
familiar with various surgical procedures correctly modifies
women nurses.• Option A vs. Option C?
No contest. Option C is the better sentence; it is not plagued by informal phrasing and a somewhat strained idiom construction.
Eliminate A.
KEEP C
Quote:
D)
having intimate knowledge of various surgical procedures, women nurses helped in the treatment of
• modifier error
The phrase
having intimate knowledge of various surgical procedures wrongly modifies "one assistant surgeon" rather than "women nurses" as is required.
By definition, a surgeon is familiar with various surgical procedures.
We need to know that the women were familiar with the various surgical procedures so that the sentence makes sense.
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E)
familiar with various surgical procedures, women nurses helped to treat
• modifier error - same problem as that in option D
→ The phrase
familiar with various surgical procedures incorrectly modifies
one assistant surgeon rather than
women nurses.
The whole point of the sentence is to tell us about women who helped surgeons on a battlefield; those women could help because they were familiar with various surgical procedures.
ELIMINATE E
The best answer is C.NOTESharshpathak96 , having eliminated all but options A and C (I think), you asked:
Quote:
I picked C because the verb "helped" is parallel to "provided" earlier in the sentence.
A doesn't have this, and all other options are grammatically incorrect.
Is my approach correct?
Excellent question and not an easy one to answer straightforwardly.
First, if we are being very strict, the verb
were in option A, in simple past tense, is also parallel to the early verb "provided."
That said, second, there is a sense in which it is much better to use an action verb (helped) with an action verb (provided) than it is to use a non-action verb (were) with an action verb (provided).
What I am describing, though, is not really parallelism as we think about it in a grammatical sense.
What I am describing is a matter of better
style, for two reasons: action verbs drive good prose and two action verbs create a brisk pace whereas one action and one non-action verb (also called a "stative" verb) create a small hiccup or at least a slowing down of the pace.
Third and finally, verbs often do not have to be parallel.
We can pair an action and non-action (stative) verb even if they are joined by
and.
Verb tenses can change within a sentence, too: Yesterday I visited Seoul and tomorrow I will visit Kuala Lumpur.
Verdict? You had good instincts. Option C is the better sentence, in part because its second verb is stronger. Nice catch.
(I'm not comfortable saying that all verbs must be parallel; stylistically, however, the two verbs in C work better than the two in A.)
COMMENTSharshpathak96 , welcome to SC Butler.
Well, I have encountered a pleasant surprise: at least three of these answers could be bumped to Best Community Reply.
I would read all the posts; each poster adds a bit of unique perspective and wisdom.
Kudos go to new posters and correct answers.
Keep up the good work.