Bicycle Manufacturer: Switching our focus from building aluminum bicyc

Question

Bicycle Manufacturer: Switching our focus from building aluminum bicycles to primarily building carbon-fiber bicycles will reduce the time taken by our manufacturing process. Although the initial construction of aluminum bicycle frames was significantly faster and simpler than the construction of carbon-fiber frames, each weld in an aluminum frame then needed to be individually checked for integrity. This required that substantial time be spent on quality control to avoid shipping out any defective frames.

Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument?

(A) Whether factory workers will require additional training in order to manufacture carbon bicycle frames

(B) Whether the carbon manufacturing process is likely to require time-consuming quality checks

(C) Whether aluminum bicycle frames with defective welds can be fixed or must be thrown away

(D) Whether there are improvements that could be introduced that would significantly reduce the rate of defects in aluminum bicycle frames

(E) Whether the demand for carbon-fiber bicycles is as high as the demand for aluminum bicycles

AnirudhaS · Answer

(B) Whether the carbon manufacturing process is likely to require time-consuming quality checks

If carbon manufacturing process also requires time-consuming quality checks, then going for aluminum frames would be better as initial build time is less.

D was also close.
(D) Whether there are improvements that could be introduced that would significantly reduce the rate of defects in aluminum bicycle frames
I guess D is not the answer because even though there might be improvements which would reduce the rate of defects, there is no way of knowing is these improvements would add addition time to the build. So the time saved on reducing the defects might be offset by this new process.

chaitanyapatil · Answer

here the bicycle manufacturer's claim is that he can reduce the total time taken by his manufacturing process.

the manufacturing process is comprised of building the bicycle and controlling the quality. The duo required different amounts of time. the aluminum bicycle requires quality control that is too time-consuming, and the manager thinks that he can reduce the total time by reducing the time Quality control takes in the complete process of manufacturing 'the bicycles'.

Though building carbon fiber bicycles takes more amount of time than building aluminum frame bicycles, manager believes he can reduce the total time the bicycle manufacturing process takes.

To evaluate his claim we might need to know, whether quality control for carbon fiber bicycle takes enough less amount of time that the manager is justified in switching to this manufacturing process?

Hence option choice B is correct and everything else is wrong.

Tejas10 · Answer

(B) Whether the carbon manufacturing process is likely to require time-consuming quality checks

Isn't there a difference between carbon manufacturing and carbon fiber frame bicycle manufacturing?

Rickooreo · Answer

Conclusion : Switching our focus from building aluminum bicycles to primarily building carbon-fiber bicycles will reduce the time taken by our manufacturing process

Only option B attacks this conclusion hence the answer

Paras96 · Answer

To evaluate the claim made in the argument, which is about switching focus to building carbon-fiber bicycles to reduce manufacturing time, we need to consider factors that are relevant to this decision. Specifically, we need to assess whether switching to carbon-fiber bicycles would indeed reduce manufacturing time. Let's evaluate each option:

A. "Whether factory workers will require additional training in order to manufacture carbon bicycle frames."
 This information is relevant because if workers need extensive training to manufacture carbon bicycle frames, it could potentially offset any time savings. However, it doesn't directly address the argument's claim about reducing manufacturing time.

B. "Whether the carbon manufacturing process is likely to require time-consuming quality checks." 
 This is highly relevant to the argument's claim. If carbon-fiber frames require extensive quality checks, it could negate the time savings achieved during construction.

C. "Whether aluminum bicycle frames with defective welds can be fixed or must be thrown away."
 While this information is important for overall business operations, it doesn't directly address the argument's focus on reducing manufacturing time. It's more related to what to do with defective products.

D. "Whether there are improvements that could be introduced that would significantly reduce the rate of defects in aluminum bicycle frames."
 This option could be relevant because if there are ways to reduce defects in aluminum frames, it might impact the need for quality control and manufacturing time. However, it doesn't directly address the main focus of switching to carbon-fiber frames.

E. "Whether the demand for carbon-fiber bicycles is as high as the demand for aluminum bicycles."
 This information is relevant to business strategy but doesn't directly address the claim about reducing manufacturing time. It focuses more on market demand.

Option B directly addresses the central issue in the argument: whether the carbon manufacturing process requires time-consuming quality checks, which could impact the claimed reduction in manufacturing time. Therefore, option B is the most useful in evaluating the claim made in the argument.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Bicycle Manufacturer: Switching our focus from building aluminum bicyc

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Bicycle Manufacturer: Switching our focus from building aluminum bicyc

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards