Hi GurpreetMahli,Great catch, and you're right to press on this, because here the two readings actually give
different answers. This isn't a case where it doesn't matter.
On a GMAT question, the standard convention is that
"prime factors" means the distinct prime numbers that divide the value - each prime counted once, no matter how many times it appears in the factorization. Under that reading:
-
210 = 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 - four distinct primes - the winner, which is why the answer is
D.
So the answer key itself confirms the intended meaning is
distinct primes.
Why the wording matters hereWatch what happens if you instead counted
every prime including repeats:
- (A) 75 = 3 × 52 -
3 total
- (B) 120 = 23 × 3 × 5 -
5 total
- (C) 144 = 24 × 32 -
6 total
- (D) 210 = 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 -
4 total
- (E) 750 = 2 × 3 × 53 -
5 total
With repetition,
144 would win with
6 - not
210. So your instinct was sharp: the two interpretations genuinely diverge, and the OA of D tells us the question means
distinct prime factors.
Japji13's note above is really getting at this same idea: once you've used the prime
2, higher powers like
4,
8,
16 aren't
new primes - they're just more copies of
2. Distinct-prime counting ignores those extra copies.
Quick rule to carry forward: unless a question explicitly says "counted with repetition" or "total factors," read
"number of prime factors" as distinct primes. That's the safe default on this exam.
Answer: DGurpreetMahli
Bunuel Does the question stem need to clarify whether it is asking for 'distinct prime factors' or 'total prime factors' (including repeats)?