So here is my logic on why E is the better answer-
Premise 1- Earn points when using X credit card in proportion to spends
Premise 2- credit can then be used to reduce the cost of your Worldwide Airlines tickets. only and only this, and nothing else.
Conclusion- this new program you can now afford purchases you couldn’t afford before.
What is the assumption?
A- Some of the destinations to which you would be likely to travel are serviced by airlines that compete with Worldwide Airlines.
Incorrect- we are not interested in any other airline except worldwide airline
B- The balance on purchases you charge with an X card is subject to an interest rate that is below average.
Incorrect- interest is out of scope on this topic, as we are looking for an assumption to tie WWA and X credit usage
C- The purchases you normally make are invariably from businesses that accept the X card.
Incorrect- Again it is out of scope since we want to link WWA and credits from X, although it is a logically sound assumption for anyone who uses credit cards.
D- You can accumulate an amount of credit with Worldwide Airlines that is at least as great as the value of any of the potential purchases you could not afford before.
Incorrect- Although again true that one might accumulate the amount of credit points worth any potential purchases, eg let’s say a Ferrari worth of points one can accumulate, but then you can only redeem these points on WWA flights which does not help you achieve your goal of owning a Ferrari.
E-You are likely to travel to at least one of the destinations serviced by Worldwide Airlines.
Correct- Logically sound and points can be used to reduce cost of WWA flight tickets, which effectively leads to our conclusion of money saved