Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
05 Sep 2023, 01:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
My 2 cents on ING Modifier
KN 1) IN cause and effect 'ING modifiers', Subject of the previous clause needs not to be modified by the modifier. It can but even if it doesn't then it will work.
KN 2) 'ING' modifer without cause and effect relationship needs someone who is performing 'modifier's action', so it will modify the previous clause's subject. Sometimes, the subject of the previous clause may not be the DOER but its fine, ING Modifier can modify DOER, BUT when DOER is not in the previous clause then it creates ambiguity - avoid ING construction.(Sacred Truce example)
Please provide me KUDOS if it helps.
Experts, Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks !
KN 1) IN cause and effect 'ING modifiers', Subject of the previous clause needs not to be modified by the modifier. It can but even if it doesn't then it will work.
KN 2) 'ING' modifer without cause and effect relationship needs someone who is performing 'modifier's action', so it will modify the previous clause's subject. Sometimes, the subject of the previous clause may not be the DOER but its fine, ING Modifier can modify DOER, BUT when DOER is not in the previous clause then it creates ambiguity - avoid ING construction.(Sacred Truce example)
Please provide me KUDOS if it helps.
Experts, Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks !
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
05 May 2025, 11:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
568 posts
10 posts
