Hi SwethaReddyL,Yes, your method is completely valid, and it's actually one of the cleanest ways to think about this. Let me show you
why it works so you can trust it next time.
The whole question is really about one fixed thing:
the total volume of punch in 10 bowls. Nothing about that volume changes - we're just measuring it in different cup sizes.
Here's your logic, confirmed:
- If you poured all of it into small glasses, you'd need
240 of them (
10 bowls ×
24).
- You actually pour
72 small glasses, which is
72/
240 =
3/10 of the total volume.
-
Therefore7/10 of the volume is still left in the bowls.
- If that
entire volume went into large glasses, it would fill
150 (
10 ×
15). Since only
7/10 of the volume remains, you fill
7/10 ×
150 =
105 large glasses. ✓
The key idea that makes this airtight: a fraction of the total volume is the
same fraction no matter which glass you measure it in. The
72 small glasses eat up
3/10 of the punch, and
3/10 of the punch is
3/10 whether you count it in small glasses or large ones. That's why you can apply the leftover
7/10 directly to the
150 large-glass capacity.
Notice this matches the other solutions in the thread exactly - Kinshook found
72 small =
45 large, leaving
150 -
45 =
105, and you got there by working with fractions of capacity instead. Same volume, same answer.
So your approach isn't a lucky shortcut - it's built on the constant-volume idea, and it will work every time a problem gives you "this many of size A
or that many of size B."
Answer: BSwethaReddyL
Bunuel, could you please confirm if this is a correct approach
if it is fully of small glasses, then we need 240; out of which 72 is small which is 72/240 = 3/10th
balance 7/10 should be filled with large glasses, if all is large ones then we need 150 large glasses; 7/10 0f 150 = 105
Thanks in advance,
Swetha