Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 09:44 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 09:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,745
Own Kudos:
810,625
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,820
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,745
Kudos: 810,625
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Akkiiii
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 13 Dec 2025
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
64
 [3]
Given Kudos: 855
Location: India
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 107
Kudos: 64
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vikg007
Joined: 15 Dec 2023
Last visit: 24 Oct 2025
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q88 V86 DI85
GPA: 7.9
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Edoua
Joined: 18 Feb 2024
Last visit: 16 Mar 2026
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 638
Posts: 103
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Even if the first 4 option seem easy to eliminate, I not convinced with option E.
My understanding of the meaning of evaluate a conclusion means to find some argument if true will strengthen the argument and if false weaken this one.

While analyzing the last one,

Does Santa Clara island contain any horse bones that can be dated to before 1650?

If Yes means that before Spanish came to Santa Clara the horses where present then weaken the conclusion.

If No means probably Spanish introduced horse in Santa Clara islands the strengthen the conclusion

Help please

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,745
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,820
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,745
Kudos: 810,625
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Santa Clara island is home to a large population of wild horses, but horses are not native to the island. It is known that Spanish settlers colonized Santa Clara island and lived there continuously from 1650 to 1740, and the bones of horses were recently found in an excavation site that can be dated to the early 1700s. Therefore it is likely that the Spanish settlers were the ones who introduced horses to Santa Clara island.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the validity of the conclusion drawn above?

A. Did the Spanish settlers introduce horses to any other islands near Santa Clara?
B. Have any excavations found evidence of human settlers who lived on Santa Clara prior to 1650?
C. Were any other nonnative species introduced to Santa Clara island by the Spanish settlers?
D. Have any human settlements remained on Santa Clara island since 1740?
E. Does Santa Clara island contain any horse bones that can be dated to before 1650?


­­
­

Veritas Prep Official Explanation



1) Horses are not native to the island (so someone had to introduce them)

and

2) Evidence exists that ties horses to the island during the time that the Spanish settlers were there

The question then really is: were the horses already there when the Spanish got there (so someone else introduced them) or did the Spanish bring them there?

Choice E helps to answer that directly: if horses were there before the Spanish got there, then the answer is no, the Spanish did not introduce the horses. Therefore, choice E is correct.

Choices A and C are similar in that they attempt to bring in correlation: other islands, and other species. But since the evidence in the argument is directly tied to the timeline, choice E this the argument head on, and an answer of "yes" to E can completely ruin the argument. With A and C, neither answer (yes or no) can either prove or destroy the argument.

Choice B has a similar problem: sure, the existence of people prior to the Spanish raises the likelihood that someone else may have introduced the horses, but this answer cannot provide direct proof either way: note that the question doesn't even ask "were there other people" but rather "has evidence been found of other people."

Choice D attacks the timeline but in the wrong way: we already have evidence of horses during the Spanish settlement, so establishing whether any people came and stayed after that does not help us date the introduction of horses.­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts