Today, it is impossible to believe we are privileged creatures literally created by divine powers or spiritual forces. We know too much. As the theory of evolution tells us: go back far enough, and our ancestors were not ‘human’ but merely human-like. In fact, many of the traits we once thought made us unique have shown up in other species. Other animals can problem-solve creatively, communicate using symbolic language, become indignant when treated unfairly, and mourn the dead. These evolutionary discoveries have profound implications for the stories our species tells itself.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument in the passage?
(A) Recent studies have shown that human cognitive abilities, such as c
omplex problem-solving and symbolic language, are still significantly more advanced compared to those observed in other species. >>>
directly mention the traits in the claims > even though they have, we are "significantly more advanced" than them > we are unique, the words describing the extent strongly indicate the difference
(B) The theory of evolution has been widely criticized for not adequately explaining the origin of human consciousness and moral reasoning. >>>
the theory of evolution just mention our ancestors are not human, not correlate to the origin.....
(C) Many cultural and religious traditions maintain that humans possess a unique spiritual essence that distinguishes them from other animals. >>>
offer another evidence, we keep this option, but we can find a better option, option a, which directly answered the question.
(D) Paleontological evidence suggests that the anatomical differences between early hominins and modern humans are far less significant than previously thought. >>>
more tiny difference between human-like(other animals) and human, actually support the claims
(E) In certain controlled experiments, animals have demonstrated abilities to recognize themselves in mirrors, a cognitive skill once believed to be uniquely human. >>>
support