Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
12 Aug 2024, 07:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
12 Aug 2024, 07:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
Correct Answer: B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
This option resolves the paradox by suggesting that despite high levels of censorship, residents find ways to circumvent these restrictions using technology like VPNs and proxy servers. This allows them to access content freely, thus maintaining or even increasing internet usage rates, because they can circumvent the censorship online, which cannot be circumvented in other channels such as print, TV, or radio content. This answer is also one of the only ones that fits into the condition identified in the question "if true and known by the residents of these countries" - if you read that element of the question carefully, this answer choice would likely jump out at you more than others such as C for example talking about vague measurement differences.
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
This answer choice does not resolve the paradox of high personal or leisure use in the face of censorship. It ignores how censorship impacts broader internet usage habits beyond work-related activities. This also makes the paradox less explained because it implies that the internet is used primarily for work-related purposes and thus should result in less usage per capita as it would not be used as much in non-working hours for leisure. Eliminate.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
This option is deliberately confusing and unclear and is also a trap. This choice introduces ambiguity rather than clarifying the paradox. We do not know if the "vary significantly between surveyed regions" varies one way or another - you may assume this explains but we only know it varied. We are also not sure how indirect engagement would be explaining the paradox and what is even indirect engagement? When an answer choice is vague like this, and asks you to come out of your comfort zone to nail you in the end, it is very likely incorrect. Eliminate cautiously.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
A larger population does not explain higher per capita internet usage under censorship. This choice is mixing apples and oranges. Eliminate.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
This choice suggests a possible skew in the survey data, which might misrepresent actual usage patterns across the entire population and it would impact all of the usage in censored and uncensored countries. However, this issue with survey data would impact both censored and uncensored countries, so the net impact would be zero (both areas surveyed would have large number of young people) and would not explain the paradox. Eliminate.
Answer: B
Economist: A recent survey found that in countries with higher rates of internet censorship, there are also higher rates of internet usage per capita. This seems counterintuitive because one might expect that restrictions on internet content would deter usage.
Which of the following, if true and known by the residents of these countries, would best help explain the paradoxical results of the survey?
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
Correct Answer: B. Residents in countries with high internet censorship often use proxy servers and VPNs, which allow them to bypass restrictions and access a broader range of content online.
This option resolves the paradox by suggesting that despite high levels of censorship, residents find ways to circumvent these restrictions using technology like VPNs and proxy servers. This allows them to access content freely, thus maintaining or even increasing internet usage rates, because they can circumvent the censorship online, which cannot be circumvented in other channels such as print, TV, or radio content. This answer is also one of the only ones that fits into the condition identified in the question "if true and known by the residents of these countries" - if you read that element of the question carefully, this answer choice would likely jump out at you more than others such as C for example talking about vague measurement differences.
A. Many residents in countries with higher internet censorship use the internet primarily for work-related purposes, which are not affected by censorship policies.
This answer choice does not resolve the paradox of high personal or leisure use in the face of censorship. It ignores how censorship impacts broader internet usage habits beyond work-related activities. This also makes the paradox less explained because it implies that the internet is used primarily for work-related purposes and thus should result in less usage per capita as it would not be used as much in non-working hours for leisure. Eliminate.
C. There is an observed trend in the data collection methodology where internet usage metrics might include both direct and indirect engagement metrics, which vary significantly between surveyed regions.
This option is deliberately confusing and unclear and is also a trap. This choice introduces ambiguity rather than clarifying the paradox. We do not know if the "vary significantly between surveyed regions" varies one way or another - you may assume this explains but we only know it varied. We are also not sure how indirect engagement would be explaining the paradox and what is even indirect engagement? When an answer choice is vague like this, and asks you to come out of your comfort zone to nail you in the end, it is very likely incorrect. Eliminate cautiously.
D. Countries with high rates of internet censorship often have higher populations, thus naturally leading to a higher total number of internet users.
A larger population does not explain higher per capita internet usage under censorship. This choice is mixing apples and oranges. Eliminate.
E. The survey included responses from a disproportionate number of young people, who tend to use the internet more frequently regardless of censorship levels.
This choice suggests a possible skew in the survey data, which might misrepresent actual usage patterns across the entire population and it would impact all of the usage in censored and uncensored countries. However, this issue with survey data would impact both censored and uncensored countries, so the net impact would be zero (both areas surveyed would have large number of young people) and would not explain the paradox. Eliminate.
Answer: B
