Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
29 Sep 2024, 16:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI) was an American automobile manufacturer based in Fremont, California. Jointly owned by General Motors and Toyota, the plant opened in 1984 and closed in April 2010. Before NUMMI, the site was the former Fremont Assembly that General Motors operated between 1962 and 1982.
Before its transformation, the relationship between workers and supervisors was adversarial. Management prioritized production quantity over quality and disregarded employee input. Like other American car plants at the time, production lines rarely stopped, and defective cars were allowed to proceed, with the expectation they would be fixed later. By the early 1980s, this environment led to widespread issues, including absenteeism, substance use during work hours, and an inability to reliably start production due to missing workers. Attempts to discipline workers were often met with grievances or even strikes, putting the plant into near-continuous chaos.
General Motors viewed the joint venture as a way to access high-quality small cars and learn from Toyota’s renowned Production System, a lean manufacturing philosophy. For Toyota, NUMMI provided a foothold in North America, helping it avoid import tariffs while gaining insights into the American labor environment, particularly in dealing with the United Auto Workers union.
Prior to reopening, Toyota sent many NUMMI workers to its Takaoka plant in Japan, where they worked on the assembly line and learned the Toyota Production System. Workers noted that Toyota's focus on quality and teamwork inspired a shift in their work ethic. Cultural changes included equal uniforms, parking, and cafeteria access for all employees, promoting a team environment. Toyota also introduced a no-layoff policy, built-in quality control processes, and employee suggestion programs for continuous improvement. Decision-making became consensus-based, a stark contrast to the previous top-down management approach.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork was the primary reason for the cultural transformation at NUMMI?
A. Workers at NUMMI reported that their overall job satisfaction improved dramatically after they returned from training in Japan.
B. The majority of other U.S.-based joint ventures between General Motors and foreign companies did not experience similar cultural transformations.
C. NUMMI’s production output increased by 20% in the first year after Toyota took over management of the plant.
D. Employees who had previously resisted management's instructions were now contributing ideas through the employee suggestion programs.
E. Toyota’s Takaoka plant, where NUMMI workers received training, had been implementing a similar production philosophy for over a decade.
Before its transformation, the relationship between workers and supervisors was adversarial. Management prioritized production quantity over quality and disregarded employee input. Like other American car plants at the time, production lines rarely stopped, and defective cars were allowed to proceed, with the expectation they would be fixed later. By the early 1980s, this environment led to widespread issues, including absenteeism, substance use during work hours, and an inability to reliably start production due to missing workers. Attempts to discipline workers were often met with grievances or even strikes, putting the plant into near-continuous chaos.
General Motors viewed the joint venture as a way to access high-quality small cars and learn from Toyota’s renowned Production System, a lean manufacturing philosophy. For Toyota, NUMMI provided a foothold in North America, helping it avoid import tariffs while gaining insights into the American labor environment, particularly in dealing with the United Auto Workers union.
Prior to reopening, Toyota sent many NUMMI workers to its Takaoka plant in Japan, where they worked on the assembly line and learned the Toyota Production System. Workers noted that Toyota's focus on quality and teamwork inspired a shift in their work ethic. Cultural changes included equal uniforms, parking, and cafeteria access for all employees, promoting a team environment. Toyota also introduced a no-layoff policy, built-in quality control processes, and employee suggestion programs for continuous improvement. Decision-making became consensus-based, a stark contrast to the previous top-down management approach.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork was the primary reason for the cultural transformation at NUMMI?
A. Workers at NUMMI reported that their overall job satisfaction improved dramatically after they returned from training in Japan.
B. The majority of other U.S.-based joint ventures between General Motors and foreign companies did not experience similar cultural transformations.
C. NUMMI’s production output increased by 20% in the first year after Toyota took over management of the plant.
D. Employees who had previously resisted management's instructions were now contributing ideas through the employee suggestion programs.
E. Toyota’s Takaoka plant, where NUMMI workers received training, had been implementing a similar production philosophy for over a decade.
29 Sep 2024, 16:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI) was an American automobile manufacturer based in Fremont, California. Jointly owned by General Motors and Toyota, the plant opened in 1984 and closed in April 2010. Before NUMMI, the site was the former Fremont Assembly that General Motors operated between 1962 and 1982.
Before its transformation, the relationship between workers and supervisors was adversarial. Management prioritized production quantity over quality and disregarded employee input. Like other American car plants at the time, production lines rarely stopped, and defective cars were allowed to proceed, with the expectation they would be fixed later. By the early 1980s, this environment led to widespread issues, including absenteeism, substance use during work hours, and an inability to reliably start production due to missing workers. Attempts to discipline workers were often met with grievances or even strikes, putting the plant into near-continuous chaos.
General Motors viewed the joint venture as a way to access high-quality small cars and learn from Toyota’s renowned Production System, a lean manufacturing philosophy. For Toyota, NUMMI provided a foothold in North America, helping it avoid import tariffs while gaining insights into the American labor environment, particularly in dealing with the United Auto Workers union.
Prior to reopening, Toyota sent many NUMMI workers to its Takaoka plant in Japan, where they worked on the assembly line and learned the Toyota Production System. Workers noted that Toyota's focus on quality and teamwork inspired a shift in their work ethic. Cultural changes included equal uniforms, parking, and cafeteria access for all employees, promoting a team environment. Toyota also introduced a no-layoff policy, built-in quality control processes, and employee suggestion programs for continuous improvement. Decision-making became consensus-based, a stark contrast to the previous top-down management approach.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork was the primary reason for the cultural transformation at NUMMI?
A. Workers at NUMMI reported that their overall job satisfaction improved dramatically after they returned from training in Japan.
B. The majority of other U.S.-based joint ventures between General Motors and foreign companies did not experience similar cultural transformations.
C. NUMMI’s production output increased by 20% in the first year after Toyota took over management of the plant.
D. Employees who had previously resisted management's instructions were now contributing ideas through the employee suggestion programs.
E. Toyota’s Takaoka plant, where NUMMI workers received training, had been implementing a similar production philosophy for over a decade.
A. Incorrect. While increased job satisfaction is positive, this does not demonstrate how Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork led to the cultural transformation at NUMMI. The increase in job satisfaction could be due to a variety of factors, not just because of improved teamwork.
B. Incorrect. Although this suggests that NUMMI’s transformation was unique, it does not provide direct evidence that quality and teamwork were responsible for the change. It offers a comparison, and states that other JV's failed at this task, but just becuase it did not fail this time, does not prove it was the cauase of it.
C. Incorrect. An increase in production output is a beneficial outcome, but this does not indicate that quality and teamwork were the driving forces behind the transformation. Production increases could be attributed to several factors unrelated to cultural changes.
D. Correct Answer. This option supports the argument that teamwork and continuous improvement programs, part of Toyota’s approach, transformed the plant’s culture. Employees moving from resistance to active participation clearly reflects a cultural change driven by Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork.
E. Incorrect. This option it does not explain how the cultural transformation at NUMMI resulted from quality and teamwork. We only know that employees at another plant have focused on similar production philosophy. This is largely irrelevant for our argument.
Answer: D
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI) was an American automobile manufacturer based in Fremont, California. Jointly owned by General Motors and Toyota, the plant opened in 1984 and closed in April 2010. Before NUMMI, the site was the former Fremont Assembly that General Motors operated between 1962 and 1982.
Before its transformation, the relationship between workers and supervisors was adversarial. Management prioritized production quantity over quality and disregarded employee input. Like other American car plants at the time, production lines rarely stopped, and defective cars were allowed to proceed, with the expectation they would be fixed later. By the early 1980s, this environment led to widespread issues, including absenteeism, substance use during work hours, and an inability to reliably start production due to missing workers. Attempts to discipline workers were often met with grievances or even strikes, putting the plant into near-continuous chaos.
General Motors viewed the joint venture as a way to access high-quality small cars and learn from Toyota’s renowned Production System, a lean manufacturing philosophy. For Toyota, NUMMI provided a foothold in North America, helping it avoid import tariffs while gaining insights into the American labor environment, particularly in dealing with the United Auto Workers union.
Prior to reopening, Toyota sent many NUMMI workers to its Takaoka plant in Japan, where they worked on the assembly line and learned the Toyota Production System. Workers noted that Toyota's focus on quality and teamwork inspired a shift in their work ethic. Cultural changes included equal uniforms, parking, and cafeteria access for all employees, promoting a team environment. Toyota also introduced a no-layoff policy, built-in quality control processes, and employee suggestion programs for continuous improvement. Decision-making became consensus-based, a stark contrast to the previous top-down management approach.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork was the primary reason for the cultural transformation at NUMMI?
A. Workers at NUMMI reported that their overall job satisfaction improved dramatically after they returned from training in Japan.
B. The majority of other U.S.-based joint ventures between General Motors and foreign companies did not experience similar cultural transformations.
C. NUMMI’s production output increased by 20% in the first year after Toyota took over management of the plant.
D. Employees who had previously resisted management's instructions were now contributing ideas through the employee suggestion programs.
E. Toyota’s Takaoka plant, where NUMMI workers received training, had been implementing a similar production philosophy for over a decade.
A. Incorrect. While increased job satisfaction is positive, this does not demonstrate how Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork led to the cultural transformation at NUMMI. The increase in job satisfaction could be due to a variety of factors, not just because of improved teamwork.
B. Incorrect. Although this suggests that NUMMI’s transformation was unique, it does not provide direct evidence that quality and teamwork were responsible for the change. It offers a comparison, and states that other JV's failed at this task, but just becuase it did not fail this time, does not prove it was the cauase of it.
C. Incorrect. An increase in production output is a beneficial outcome, but this does not indicate that quality and teamwork were the driving forces behind the transformation. Production increases could be attributed to several factors unrelated to cultural changes.
D. Correct Answer. This option supports the argument that teamwork and continuous improvement programs, part of Toyota’s approach, transformed the plant’s culture. Employees moving from resistance to active participation clearly reflects a cultural change driven by Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork.
E. Incorrect. This option it does not explain how the cultural transformation at NUMMI resulted from quality and teamwork. We only know that employees at another plant have focused on similar production philosophy. This is largely irrelevant for our argument.
Answer: D
11 Nov 2024, 05:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
bb
Bunuel
Can you please elaborate on why D is correct?
I think that D) shows that employees began participating in suggestion programs, but it doesn’t clearly link this change to Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork as opposed to other management changes.
I think A) links Toyota’s influence to a positive cultural shift (workers’ satisfaction improved specifically after their training in Japan), and high job satisfaction often indicates an improvement in workplace culture.
Bunuel
Can you please elaborate on why D is correct?
I think that D) shows that employees began participating in suggestion programs, but it doesn’t clearly link this change to Toyota’s focus on quality and teamwork as opposed to other management changes.
I think A) links Toyota’s influence to a positive cultural shift (workers’ satisfaction improved specifically after their training in Japan), and high job satisfaction often indicates an improvement in workplace culture.
