Some might perhaps find it hard to accept that emotions have a cognitive component. It might seem as if an emotion as primal as, say, grief has nothing to do with cognition. After all, a cow separated from her calf feels grief; are we to ascribe a cognitive component to her moos of distress? Nussbaum would simply answer yes. The cow cannot of course express her grief in the form of a proposition. Nevertheless, her grief arises from knowledge. She knows her calf is important to her, she knows her calf is missing, and she knows this is outside her control (that is why she grieves).
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the passage?
A) Grief, as a response to loss, is common among animals, but there is no scientific evidence to suggest that these animals possess the cognitive ability to recognize the significance of their relationships or the absence of control.
B) There is a significant difference between animal grief and human grief in that animals experience a primal, emotional response to separation without any higher-level cognitive awareness of the situation.
C) While some animals experience grief, they do so in a way that is largely driven by instinctual behavior and not based on understanding the emotional consequences of their actions or the implications of loss.
D) Studies on animal emotions indicate that grief is likely an instinctual response, triggered by a loss, without the animal understanding why they feel distress or having any conscious knowledge of the significance of the loss.
E) The grieving behavior in animals, such as cows, is often observed to occur under specific environmental conditions, suggesting that grief may be more closely linked to environmental triggers than to any cognitive understanding of the situation.