Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
17 Jun 2025, 11:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
33% (02:15) correct
67%
(02:25)
wrong
based on 79
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
WHAT DO SALMON fillets, fake eyelashes and animated children’s TV shows all have in common? All these familiar parts of Western daily lives have recently been touched by North Korean labour. In an online shopping world where many consumers hit the "sort by price" button, North Korea’s combination of low-cost and high-skilled labour is irresistible for contractors with a tight bottom line.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that North Korean labor is irresistible to contractors?
A) International sanctions have forced some contractors to absorb fines for using North Korean labor.
B) Contractors using North Korean labor face protracted legal disputes over supply-chain disclosures, incurring litigation costs that negate initial savings.
C) North Korean workers often require extensive remediation and training to meet quality standards, eroding cost savings.
D) Projects using North Korean labor experience frequent rework due to cultural misinterpretations in creative outputs, doubling production time.
E) North Korean labor's skill set, while strong in manufacturing, is frequently incompatible with Western creative standards in fields like animation.
A) Sanctions increase costs, but they don't show that labor itself lacks skill. This only partially challenges the argument since cheaper options might still attract contractors.
B) Legal costs may eliminate initial savings, but this doesn't mean the workers lack skill. Contractors might still find the high-skill aspect beneficial if disputes are resolved.
C) This directly erodes both advantages: costly training proves skills aren't immediately sufficient, and savings disappear. It undermines the whole case for using this labor source.
D) While this weakens the claim for creative projects like TV shows, it doesn't affect industries like salmon processing where cultural issues may not arise.
E) If skills only falter in animation, contractors can still benefit in eyelash or salmon production, so this challenge isn't universal.
The argument depends on labor being both low-cost AND high-skill across all contexts. Option C alone damages both qualities universally. Others are less effective: A and B focus only on cost, while D and E weaken skill or cost in just one area, leaving the core claim strong elsewhere.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that North Korean labor is irresistible to contractors?
A) International sanctions have forced some contractors to absorb fines for using North Korean labor.
B) Contractors using North Korean labor face protracted legal disputes over supply-chain disclosures, incurring litigation costs that negate initial savings.
C) North Korean workers often require extensive remediation and training to meet quality standards, eroding cost savings.
D) Projects using North Korean labor experience frequent rework due to cultural misinterpretations in creative outputs, doubling production time.
E) North Korean labor's skill set, while strong in manufacturing, is frequently incompatible with Western creative standards in fields like animation.
Show SpoilerHints
Focus on what makes the labor seem irresistible: the two-part advantage. The strongest weakening evidence will challenge both the low cost and high skill for all types of work mentioned.
Show SpoilerExplanations
A) Sanctions increase costs, but they don't show that labor itself lacks skill. This only partially challenges the argument since cheaper options might still attract contractors.
B) Legal costs may eliminate initial savings, but this doesn't mean the workers lack skill. Contractors might still find the high-skill aspect beneficial if disputes are resolved.
C) This directly erodes both advantages: costly training proves skills aren't immediately sufficient, and savings disappear. It undermines the whole case for using this labor source.
D) While this weakens the claim for creative projects like TV shows, it doesn't affect industries like salmon processing where cultural issues may not arise.
E) If skills only falter in animation, contractors can still benefit in eyelash or salmon production, so this challenge isn't universal.
The argument depends on labor being both low-cost AND high-skill across all contexts. Option C alone damages both qualities universally. Others are less effective: A and B focus only on cost, while D and E weaken skill or cost in just one area, leaving the core claim strong elsewhere.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
20 Jun 2025, 10:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
WHAT DO SALMON fillets, fake eyelashes and animated children’s TV shows all have in common? All these familiar parts of Western daily lives have recently been touched by North Korean labour. In an online shopping world where many consumers hit the "sort by price" button, North Korea’s combination of low-cost and high-skilled labour is irresistible for contractors with a tight bottom line.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that North Korean labor is irresistible to contractors?
A) International sanctions have forced some contractors to absorb fines for using North Korean labor.
B) Contractors using North Korean labor face protracted legal disputes over supply-chain disclosures, incurring litigation costs that negate initial savings.
C) North Korean workers often require extensive remediation and training to meet quality standards, eroding cost savings.
D) Projects using North Korean labor experience frequent rework due to cultural misinterpretations in creative outputs, doubling production time.
E) North Korean labor's skill set, while strong in manufacturing, is frequently incompatible with Western creative standards in fields like animation.
While C is the answer, arent contractors the ones who just pay for the goods and sell it to the consumers? why would contractors look after the training of the staff ?
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the claim that North Korean labor is irresistible to contractors?
A) International sanctions have forced some contractors to absorb fines for using North Korean labor.
B) Contractors using North Korean labor face protracted legal disputes over supply-chain disclosures, incurring litigation costs that negate initial savings.
C) North Korean workers often require extensive remediation and training to meet quality standards, eroding cost savings.
D) Projects using North Korean labor experience frequent rework due to cultural misinterpretations in creative outputs, doubling production time.
E) North Korean labor's skill set, while strong in manufacturing, is frequently incompatible with Western creative standards in fields like animation.
While C is the answer, arent contractors the ones who just pay for the goods and sell it to the consumers? why would contractors look after the training of the staff ?
21 Jun 2025, 02:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
Presha123
Naah, "contractor" is a more generic term. It can refer to a material contractor, a labor contractor, or a works contractor. It's not just restricted to a middleman buying finished goods, so they'd definitely care about the labor quality and costs.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
